From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The IO problem on multiple PCI busses
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 03:25:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19350125195650.22439@mailhost.mipsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15008.17278.154154.210086@pizda.ninka.net>
In-Reply-To: <15008.17278.154154.210086@pizda.ninka.net>
>No, don't do this, it is evil. Use mappings, specify the device
>related info somehow when creating the mapping (in the userspace
>variant you do this by openning a specific device to mmap, in the
>kernel variant you can encode the bus/dev/etc. info in the device's
>resource and decode this at ioremap() time, see?).
Well, except that drivers doing IOs don't ioremap...
Maybe we could define an ioremap-like function for IOs, but the more
we discuss this, the more I feel that for in-kernel, a simple function
that returns a per-bus io base (and another one for ISA mem) is plenty
enough for the few legacy things we have to deal with (mostly VGA).
For PCI drivers doing IOs, we just need to have the IO resource
structures to be properly fixed up (include the correct iobase already).
That iobase can either be a mix of a real io address and a "cooking" in
the high bits like parisc, or it can be an address ioremap'd in the
correct bus mapping when it's possible, or whatever...
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-03 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-01 15:33 The IO problem on multiple PCI busses Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-01 15:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-01 18:30 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-01 19:09 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 19:33 ` Dan Malek
2001-03-01 19:41 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 19:59 ` Dan Malek
2001-03-01 20:22 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 20:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-01 20:27 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-02 11:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-03 1:08 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 19:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-01 20:21 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 22:26 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-02 11:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-03 1:06 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-03 2:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2001-03-03 11:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-03-03 17:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-03-05 16:20 ` David Woodhouse
2001-03-06 23:01 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-03-07 2:07 ` Tony Mantler
2001-03-05 23:21 ` Chris Wedgwood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-02 1:22 Grant Grundler
2001-03-02 2:19 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-02 17:46 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19350125195650.22439@mailhost.mipsys.com \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox