From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
rgb@redhat.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for v3.14] AUDIT: Allow login in non-init namespaces
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 20:08:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19406418.LIeRWhPu7h@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396220874.6974.5.camel@localhost>
On Sunday, March 30, 2014 07:07:54 PM Eric Paris wrote:
> It its possible to configure your PAM stack to refuse login if
> audit messages (about the login) were unable to be sent. This is common
> in many distros and thus normal configuration of many containers. The
> PAM modules determine if audit is enabled/disabled in the kernel based
> on the return value from sending an audit message on the netlink socket.
> If userspace gets back ECONNREFUSED it believes audit is disabled in the
> kernel. If it gets any other error else it refuses to let the login
> proceed.
This is a requirement. I do not advocate "tricking" user space. If you do, I
might have to fix the bug you created. What should be done is have some
discussion about the problem so that everyone involved has some chance to
discuss the problem.
-Steve
> Just about ever since the introduction of namespaces the kernel audit
> subsystem has returned EPERM if the task sending a message was not in
> the init user or pid namespace. So many forms of containers have never
> worked if audit was enabled in the kernel.
>
> BUT if the container was not in net_init then the kernel network code
> would send ECONNREFUSED (instead of the audit code sending EPERM). Thus
> by pure accident/dumb luck/bug if an admin configured the PAM stack to
> reject all logins that didn't talk to audit, but then ran the login
> untility in the non-init_net namespace, it would work!! Clearly this
> was a bug, but it is a bug some people expected.
>
> With the introduction of network namespace support in 3.14-rc1 the two
> bugs stopped cancelling each other out. Now, containers in the
> non-init_net namespace refused to let users log in (just like PAM was
> configfured!) Obviously some people were not happy that what used to
> let users log in, now didn't!
>
> This fix is kinda hacky. We return ECONNREFUSED for all non-init
> relevant namespaces. That means that not only will the old broken
> non-init_net setups continue to work, now the broken non-init_pid or
> non-init_user setups will 'work'. They don't really work, since audit
> isn't logging things. But it's what most users want.
>
> In 3.15 we should have patches to support not only the non-init_net
> (3.14) namespace but also the non-init_pid and non-init_user namespace.
> So all will be right in the world. This just opens the doors wide open
> on 3.14 and hopefully makes users happy, if not the audit system...
>
> Reported-by: Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net>
> Reported-by: Adam Richter <adam_richter2004@yahoo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/audit.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 3392d3e..95a20f3 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -608,9 +608,19 @@ static int audit_netlink_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, u16
> msg_type) int err = 0;
>
> /* Only support the initial namespaces for now. */
> + /*
> + * We return ECONNREFUSED because it tricks userspace into thinking
> + * that audit was not configured into the kernel. Lots of users
> + * configure their PAM stack (because that's what the distro does)
> + * to reject login if unable to send messages to audit. If we return
> + * ECONNREFUSED the PAM stack thinks the kernel does not have audit
> + * configured in and will let login proceed. If we return EPERM
> + * userspace will reject all logins. This should be removed when we
> + * support non init namespaces!!
> + */
> if ((current_user_ns() != &init_user_ns) ||
> (task_active_pid_ns(current) != &init_pid_ns))
> - return -EPERM;
> + return -ECONNREFUSED;
>
> switch (msg_type) {
> case AUDIT_LIST:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-30 23:07 [PATCH for v3.14] AUDIT: Allow login in non-init namespaces Eric Paris
2014-03-31 0:57 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-03-31 4:00 ` gaofeng
2014-04-01 0:43 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-10 0:08 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2014-04-10 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19406418.LIeRWhPu7h@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox