public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Bug 849] New: [perf][tiobench] tiobench sequential write degrades in 2.5.72-bk2
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:28:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <194570000.1056493684@flay> (raw)

http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=849

           Summary: [perf][tiobench] tiobench sequential write degrades in
                    2.5.72-bk2
    Kernel Version: 2.5.72-bk2
            Status: NEW
          Severity: high
             Owner: akpm@digeo.com
         Submitter: slpratt@us.ibm.com


Hardware Environment: 8way 900mhz adaptec scsi drives

Software Environment: sles8.0 + 2.5 kernel

Problem Description:

tiobench sequential write throughput drops between 2.5.72-bk1 and 2.5.72-bk2 for
multi threaded IO.

                                 tolerance = 1.00 + 5.00% of 2.5.72-bk1
             2.5.72-bk1   2.5.72-bk2
    Theads      MBs/sec      MBs/sec    %diff         diff    tolerance
---------- ------------ ------------ -------- ------------ ------------
         1        43.27        42.90    -0.86        -0.37         3.16 
        16        11.86         4.35   -63.32        -7.51         1.59  * 
        64         3.95         2.50   -36.71        -1.45         1.20  * 


Results:Sequential Write CPU (Graph)
 
                                 tolerance = 1.00 + 3.00% of 2.5.72-bk1
             2.5.72-bk1   2.5.72-bk2
    Theads         %CPU         %CPU    %diff         diff    tolerance
---------- ------------ ------------ -------- ------------ ------------
         1       52.87%       50.78%    -3.95        -2.09         2.59 
        16       127.6%       49.03%   -61.58       -78.57         4.83  * 
        64       37.51%       22.15%   -40.95       -15.36         2.13  * 


http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.72-bk2/2.5.72-bk1-vs-2.5.72-bk2/
Folloow link for tiobench.ext3 summary report and full results.

Steps to reproduce:
tiobench  --dir /mnt/tmp --block 4096 --size 600 --numruns 10 --threads 16


                 reply	other threads:[~2003-06-24 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=194570000.1056493684@flay \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox