Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf trampoline support "jmp" mode

Steven Rostedt
2025-11-14T16:28:09Z

On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 21:58:34 +0800
Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@linux.dev> wrote:

> On 2025/11/14 21:38, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:24:43 +0800
> > Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Therefore, we introduce the "jmp" mode for bpf trampoline, as advised by
> > > Alexei in [1]. And the logic will become this:
> > > call foo -> jmp trampoline -> call foo-body ->
> > > return foo-body -> return foo
> >
> > This obviously only works when there's a single function used by that
> > trampoline. It also doesn't allow tracing of the return side (it's
> > basically just the function tracer for a single function).
>
> Hi, Steven. I think you misunderstand something? For the fentry/fexit,
> the whole process is:

Yeah, I got a bit confused by the notation above.

>
> call foo -> jmp trampoline -> call all the fentry bpf progs ->
> call foo-body -> return foo-body -> call all the fexit bpf progs
> -> return foo.
>
> The "call foo-body" means "origin call", and it will store the
> return value of the traced function to the stack, therefore the
> fexit progs can get it.
>
> So it can trace the return side with the "fexit". And it's almost the
> same as the origin logic of the bpf trampoline:

OK, so this is just the way it always works.

>
> call foo -> call trampoline -> call all the fentry bpf progs ->
> call foo-body -> return foo-body -> call all the fexit bpf progs
> -> skip the rip -> return foo.
>
> What I did here is just replace the "call trampoline" to
> "jmp trampoline".
>
> >
> > Is there any mechanism to make sure that the trampoline being called is
> > only used by that one function? I haven't looked at the code yet, but
> > should there be a test that makes sure a trampoline isn't registered for
> > two or more different functions?
>
> As for now, the bpf trampoline is per-function. Every trampoline
> has a unique key, and we find the trampoline for the target function
> by that key. So it can't be used by two or more different functions.
>
> If the trampoline need to get the ip of the origin call from the stack,
> such as BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY case, we will fallback to the
> "call" mode, as we can't get the rip from the stack in the "jmp" mode.
> And I think this is what you mean "only work for a single function"?
> Yeah, we fallback on such case.

OK, I got lost in the notation. It doesn't need a "call" because each
trampoline is only for a single function. Hence it doesn't need to know the
return address.

-- Steve