From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Souradeep Chowdhury <quic_schowdhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: misc: qcom_eud: Access EUD_MODE_MANAGER2 through secure calls
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 16:00:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19507b60-ef03-4fac-96dc-f8700f74c0e1@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7mv4u2parcyzrm67yufuor3cwx265kaoae23rksbbuu4aaayl@7a6xxfmganof>
On 6/28/25 7:44 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 06:21:31PM +0530, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>> EUD_MODE_MANAGER2 register is mapped to a memory region that is marked
>> as read-only for HLOS, enforcing access restrictions that prohibit
>> direct memory-mapped writes via writel().
>>
>> Attempts to write to this region from HLOS can result in silent failures
>> or memory access violations, particularly when toggling EUD (Embedded
>> USB Debugger) state. To ensure secure register access, modify the driver
>> to use qcom_scm_io_writel(), which routes the write operation to Qualcomm
>> Secure Channel Monitor (SCM). SCM has the necessary permissions to access
>> protected memory regions, enabling reliable control over EUD state.
>>
>> SC7280, the only user of EUD is also affected, indicating that this could
>> never have worked on a properly fused device.
>
> Most likely SC7280 Chrome platforms were fused differently or used a
> different configuration of the TZ.
They were not fused for production, as I understand
> The question is whether there can be other platforms (e.g. SC7180 Chrome
> or SDM845 Cheeza prototypes) which should use direct register access
> instead of going through the SCM.
TF-A currently needs an update to the SCM MMIO R/W address whitelist,
but in any case, a write from !TZ is not going to be accepted by the
hardware
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-28 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 12:51 [PATCH v2] usb: misc: qcom_eud: Access EUD_MODE_MANAGER2 through secure calls Komal Bajaj
2025-06-28 5:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-28 14:00 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2025-06-28 14:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-28 14:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-08 5:53 ` Komal Bajaj
2025-07-08 8:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-30 18:11 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19507b60-ef03-4fac-96dc-f8700f74c0e1@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_schowdhu@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox