From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP?
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 02:25:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1953902.drhraqW2It@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1961527.dEtpL4HAvs@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Friday, May 06, 2016 02:09:07 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 05, 2016 04:49:22 PM Steve Muckle wrote:
> > While working on a few patches for schedutil I noticed that the CFS
> > cpufreq hooks depend on PELT, which depends on CONFIG_SMP.
> >
> > I compiled and ran a UP kernel with intel_pstate. Running a cpu-bound
> > task did not result in the frequency increasing beyond fmin. For some reason
> > ondemand is working for me with the same test, not sure why yet.
> >
> > It appears dbs/intel-pstate/schedutil have a dependency on CONFIG_SMP
> > now. Or am I missing something?
>
> You're right AFAICS.
>
> For governors other than schedutil fixing that would be a matter of
> adding a !CONFIG_SMP variant of update_load_avg() that will call
> cpufreq_update_util() and do nothing else. It doesn't matter what
> is passed via util and max then.
Maybe something like the below, FWIW, as a quick fix for 4.6?
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3030,7 +3030,14 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
-static inline void update_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se, int update_tg) {}
+static inline void update_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se, int not_used)
+{
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
+
+ cpufreq_trigger_update(rq_clock(rq));
+}
+
static inline void
enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) {}
static inline void
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-06 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-05 23:49 cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? Steve Muckle
2016-05-06 0:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-06 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-05-06 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-06 11:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-06 0:25 ` Steve Muckle
2016-05-06 0:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-06 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1953902.drhraqW2It@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox