From: linuxjob <linuxjob@163.net>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What is 2.4 Linux networking performance like compared to BSD?
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:05:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1978548522.20010302110550@163.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A9D891C.434E3AA7@namesys.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A9D891C.434E3AA7@namesys.com>
Hello Hans,
Thursday, March 01, 2001, 7:26:20 AM, you wrote:
HR> I have a client that wants to implement a webcache, but is very leery of
HR> implementing it on Linux rather than BSD.
HR> They know that iMimic's polymix performance on Linux 2.2.* is half what it is on
HR> BSD. Has the Linux 2.4 networking code caught up to BSD?
HR> Can I tell them not to worry about the Linux networking code strangling their
HR> webcache product's performance, or not?
HR> Hans
HR> -
HR> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
HR> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
HR> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
HR> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
It is not only related to TCP/IP performance. it is related to whole
OS performance. especially performance of file system and stablity,
network driver performance etc.
FreeBSD with softupdates turned on seems horrible fast and stable.
but Linux 2.4 is horrible fast in TCP/IP too. diffcult to compare between
in Linux and FreeBSD. don't do such stupid thing. you'll never get a
correct result.
--
Best regards,
David Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-02 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-28 23:26 What is 2.4 Linux networking performance like compared to BSD? Hans Reiser
2001-03-01 4:25 ` Todd
2001-03-01 16:03 ` Hans Reiser
2001-03-01 17:04 ` Nathan Dabney
2001-03-01 18:36 ` Hans Reiser
2001-03-01 19:16 ` David Weinehall
2001-03-01 19:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-02 4:57 ` David L. Parsley
2001-03-01 19:22 ` Nathan Dabney
2001-03-02 9:02 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-03-02 13:00 ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-03-05 8:09 ` Re[2]: " linuxjob
2001-03-02 14:28 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-01 17:17 ` God
2001-03-01 18:04 ` Lincoln Dale
2001-03-01 10:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-01 17:15 ` James Lewis Nance
2001-03-01 18:38 ` Hans Reiser
2001-03-01 19:25 ` Tigran Aivazian
2001-03-01 23:30 ` Hans Reiser
2001-03-01 20:26 ` kuznet
2001-03-02 3:05 ` linuxjob [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1978548522.20010302110550@163.net \
--to=linuxjob@163.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox