From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 19:55:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 19:55:25 -0400 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:30224 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 19:55:16 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: "Grover, Andrew" cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "Acpi-linux (E-mail)" Subject: Re: RFC: moving ACPI includes under include/ In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2001 15:40:48 MST." <4148FEAAD879D311AC5700A0C969E89006CDE006@orsmsx35.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 09:55:03 +1000 Message-ID: <19806.996710103@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 15:40:48 -0700 , "Grover, Andrew" wrote: >The ACPI driver currently has its own little include directory under >drivers/acpi. > >...thinking about moving these to include/acpi -- that seems to be the >dominant Linux paradigm. Sound reasonable? Good idea. SCSI used to have include/scsi but moved the include files to drivers/scsi and it is obvious that the move was a mistake. Far too much code has abominations like #include "../../scsi/hosts.h". large enough sub systems should have their own directory under include.