From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599DFC433F4 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2AE2156F for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:03:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EA2AE2156F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391659AbeIVFzA (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:55:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42598 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725748AbeIVFzA (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:55:00 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA64C059B7F; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-123-84.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.84]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7876187E53; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20180910150903.249031442dd7fe43e01812cf@linux-foundation.org> References: <20180910150903.249031442dd7fe43e01812cf@linux-foundation.org> <0db6c314-1ef4-9bfa-1baa-7214dd2ee061@infradead.org> <20180909220018.GH13219@asgard.redhat.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Eugene Syromiatnikov , Randy Dunlap , LKML , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Mat Martineau , stable Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] uapi/linux/keyctl.h: don't use C++ reserved keyword as a struct member name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <19866.1537574620.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:03:40 +0100 Message-ID: <19867.1537574620@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Are there such programs? Do they reference the `private' field? They would use the keyutils.h header from keyutils package probably. There the field was named "priv" not "private". The kernel's UAPI header should be amended again to match that. David