Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: drm/amd: Remove the redundant null pointer check in list_for_each_entry() loops

[Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>]

[+Jon]

Am 2023-06-12 um 07:58 schrieb Lu Hongfei:
> pqn bound in list_for_each_entry loop will not be null, so there is
> no need to check whether pqn is NULL or not.
> Thus remove a redundant null pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@vivo.com>
> ---
> The filename of the previous version was:
> 0001-gpu-drm-amd-Fix-the-bug-in-list_for_each_entry-loops.patch
>
> The modifications made compared to the previous version are as follows:
> 1. Modified the patch title
> 2. "Thus remove a redundant null pointer check." is used instead of
>     "We could remove this check."
>
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.c | 3 ---
>   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.c
> index cd34e7aaead4..10d0cef844f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.c
> @@ -1097,9 +1097,6 @@ void kfd_dbg_set_enabled_debug_exception_mask(struct kfd_process *target,
>   
>   	pqm = &target->pqm;
>   	list_for_each_entry(pqn, &pqm->queues, process_queue_list) {
> -		if (!pqn)

Right, this check doesn't make a lot of sense. Jon, was this meant to 
check pqn->q?

Regards,
   Felix


> -			continue;
> -
>   		found_mask |= pqn->q->properties.exception_status;
>   	}
>