From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Phil Pemberton <philpem@philpem.me.uk>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] ata: libata-scsi: route non-zero LUN commands for multi-LUN ATAPI
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:29:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19b6da9d-5954-457c-be17-877a5c3fd9cf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260426190920.2051289-4-philpem@philpem.me.uk>
On 4/27/26 4:09 AM, Phil Pemberton wrote:
> Two changes are required to route commands to ATAPI LUNs other than 0:
>
> 1. __ata_scsi_find_dev(): The existing code rejects any scsi_device
> with a non-zero LUN, returning NULL and dropping the command on
> the floor. Relax both the PMP and non-PMP branches to allow
> non-zero LUNs through when the underlying ata_device is ATAPI
> class, since ATAPI devices can legitimately expose multiple LUNs.
>
> 2. atapi_xlat(): Older ATAPI devices (SCSI-2 era) expect the LUN in
> CDB byte 1 bits 7:5 rather than relying on transport-level LUN
> addressing. Encode scmd->device->lun into those bits, preserving
> the existing command-specific bits in 4:0. This is required by
> both the Panasonic PD/CD combos and Nakamichi CD changers. LUNs
> beyond 7 cannot be encoded in the 3-bit CDB field; reject them
> with AC_ERR_INVALID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Pemberton <philpem@philpem.me.uk>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 317883bac25f..48c7d323d6f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -2951,6 +2951,11 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> memset(qc->cdb, 0, dev->cdb_len);
> memcpy(qc->cdb, scmd->cmnd, scmd->cmd_len);
>
> + /* SCSI-2 CDB LUN encoding: bits 7:5 of byte 1 (3-bit field) */
> + if (scmd->device->lun >= 8)
Instead of 8, please use ATAPI_MAX_LUN.
Since this should never happen, this also warrants the use of WARN_ON_ONCE()
for the if condition.
> + return AC_ERR_INVALID;
> + qc->cdb[1] = (qc->cdb[1] & 0x1f) | ((u8)scmd->device->lun << 5);
> +
> qc->complete_fn = atapi_qc_complete;
>
> qc->tf.flags |= ATA_TFLAG_ISADDR | ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE;
> @@ -3059,19 +3064,27 @@ static struct ata_device *ata_find_dev(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int devno)
> static struct ata_device *__ata_scsi_find_dev(struct ata_port *ap,
> const struct scsi_device *scsidev)
> {
> + struct ata_device *dev;
> int devno;
>
> /* skip commands not addressed to targets we simulate */
> if (!sata_pmp_attached(ap)) {
> - if (unlikely(scsidev->channel || scsidev->lun))
> + if (unlikely(scsidev->channel))
> return NULL;
> devno = scsidev->id;
> } else {
> - if (unlikely(scsidev->id || scsidev->lun))
> + if (unlikely(scsidev->id))
> return NULL;
> devno = scsidev->channel;
> }
>
> + if (unlikely(scsidev->lun)) {
> + dev = ata_find_dev(ap, devno);
> + if (!dev || dev->class != ATA_DEV_ATAPI)
> + return NULL;
> + return dev;
> + }
This really should come first in the function. Otherwise, you are radically
changing the function since you removed the scsidev->lun checks for the
preceding checks.
> +
> return ata_find_dev(ap, devno);
> }
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-26 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-26 19:09 [PATCH v3 0/7] ata: libata-scsi: multi-LUN ATAPI device support Phil Pemberton
2026-04-26 19:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] ata: libata-scsi: add atapi_max_lun module parameter Phil Pemberton
2026-04-26 23:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-26 19:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] ata: libata-scsi: convert dev->sdev to per-LUN array Phil Pemberton
2026-04-26 23:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-26 19:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] ata: libata-scsi: route non-zero LUN commands for multi-LUN ATAPI Phil Pemberton
2026-04-26 23:29 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-04-27 11:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-04-26 19:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] scsi: add BLIST_NO_LUN_1F blacklist flag Phil Pemberton
2026-04-26 23:32 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-27 11:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-04-26 19:09 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] ata: libata-scsi: probe additional LUNs for multi-LUN ATAPI devices Phil Pemberton
2026-04-26 23:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-26 19:09 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] scsi: scsi_devinfo: add COMPAQ PD-1 multi-LUN ATAPI device quirk Phil Pemberton
2026-04-26 23:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-27 11:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-04-26 19:09 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] scsi: scsi_devinfo: extend BLIST_NO_LUN_1F to MATSHITA and NEC PD-1 variants Phil Pemberton
2026-04-26 23:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-27 11:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-04-27 12:12 ` Phil Pemberton
2026-05-06 0:52 ` Phil Pemberton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19b6da9d-5954-457c-be17-877a5c3fd9cf@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=philpem@philpem.me.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox