From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
andres@anarazel.de, willy@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
hch@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 2/2] buffer: record blockdev write errors in super_block that it backs
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:37:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19cac5afa0496e049535f5129804b687cdf64dbb.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414162639.GK28226@quack2.suse.cz>
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 18:26 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 14-04-20 08:04:09, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> >
> > When syncing out a block device (a'la __sync_blockdev), any error
> > encountered will only be recorded in the bd_inode's mapping. When the
> > blockdev contains a filesystem however, we'd like to also record the
> > error in the super_block that's stored there.
> >
> > Make mark_buffer_write_io_error also record the error in the
> > corresponding super_block when a writeback error occurs and the block
> > device contains a mounted superblock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>
> The patch looks good to me. I'd just note that bh->b_bdev->bd_super
> dereference is safe only because we will flush all dirty data when
> unmounting a filesystem which is somewhat tricky. Maybe that warrants a
> comment? Otherwise feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Oh, hmm...now that I look again, I'm not sure this is actually safe.
bh->b_bdev gets cleared out as we discard the buffer, so I don't think
that could end up getting zeroed while we're still using it.
The bd_super pointer gets zeroed out in kill_block_super, and after that
point it calls sync_blockdev(). Could writeback error processing race
with kill_block_super such that bd_inode gets set to NULL after we test
it but before we dereference it?
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-14 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 12:04 [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/2] vfs: have syncfs() return error when there are writeback errors Jeff Layton
2020-04-14 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 RESEND 1/2] vfs: track per-sb writeback errors and report them to syncfs Jeff Layton
2020-04-14 16:23 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-14 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 RESEND 2/2] buffer: record blockdev write errors in super_block that it backs Jeff Layton
2020-04-14 16:26 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-14 18:37 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2020-04-15 9:17 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19cac5afa0496e049535f5129804b687cdf64dbb.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox