From: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
"oliver.upton@linux.dev" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
"joey.gouly@arm.com" <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"yuzenghui@huawei.com" <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"ryan.roberts@arm.com" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"shahuang@redhat.com" <shahuang@redhat.com>,
"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Aniket Agashe <aniketa@nvidia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@nvidia.com>,
"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@nvidia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Andy Currid <acurrid@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <danw@nvidia.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>, Uday Dhoke <udhoke@nvidia.com>,
Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@nvidia.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"sebastianene@google.com" <sebastianene@google.com>,
"coltonlewis@google.com" <coltonlewis@google.com>,
"kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"yi.l.liu@intel.com" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"gshan@redhat.com" <gshan@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"tabba@google.com" <tabba@google.com>,
"qperret@google.com" <qperret@google.com>,
"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"maobibo@loongson.cn" <maobibo@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:51:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a14ee0a-04af-407d-89a5-5222ee6da9c7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR12MB7199F8346F2CA802E9F3965DB040A@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On 7/2/25 5:33 AM, Ankit Agrawal wrote:
>> Grace based platforms such as Grace Hopper/Blackwell Superchips have
>> CPU accessible cache coherent GPU memory. The GPU device memory is
>> essentially a DDR memory and retains properties such as cacheability,
>> unaligned accesses, atomics and handling of executable faults. This
>> requires the device memory to be mapped as NORMAL in stage-2.
>>
>> Today KVM forces the memory to either NORMAL or DEVICE_nGnRE depending
>> on whether the memory region is added to the kernel. The KVM code is
>> thus restrictive and prevents device memory that is not added to the
>> kernel to be marked as cacheable. The patch aims to solve this.
>>
>> A cachebility check is made by consulting the VMA pgprot value. If
>> the pgprot mapping type is cacheable, it is considered safe to be
>> mapped cacheable as the KVM S2 will have the same Normal memory type
>> as the VMA has in the S1 and KVM has no additional responsibility
>> for safety.
>>
>> Note when FWB (Force Write Back) is not enabled, the kernel expects to
>> trivially do cache management by flushing the memory by linearly
>> converting a kvm_pte to phys_addr to a KVA. The cache management thus
>> relies on memory being mapped. Since the GPU device memory is not kernel
>> mapped, exit when the FWB is not supported. Similarly, ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC
>> allows KVM to avoid flushing the icache and turns icache_inval_pou() into
>> a NOP. So the cacheable PFNMAP is made contingent on these two hardware
>> features.
>>
>> The ability to safely do the cacheable mapping of PFNMAP is exposed
>> through a KVM capability for userspace consumption.
>>
>> The changes are heavily influenced by the discussions among
>> maintainers Marc Zyngier and Oliver Upton besides Jason Gunthorpe,
>> Catalin Marinas, David Hildenbrand, Sean Christopherson [1]. Many
>> thanks for their valuable suggestions.
>>
>> Applied over next-20250610 and tested on the Grace Blackwell
>> platform by booting up VM, loading NVIDIA module [2] and running
>> nvidia-smi in the VM.
>>
>> To run CUDA workloads, there is a dependency on the IOMMUFD and the
>> Nested Page Table patches being worked on separately by Nicolin Chen.
>> (nicolinc@nvidia.com). NVIDIA has provided git repositories which
>> includes all the requisite kernel [3] and Qemu [4] patches in case
>> one wants to try.
>>
>> v8 -> v9
>> 1. Included MIXEDMAP to also be considered for cacheable mapping.
>> (Jason Gunthorpe).
>> 2. Minor text nits (Jason Gunthorpe).
>
> Humble reminder for review.
>
Apologies for the delay, I had some issues getting a Grace-Hopper to test on,
and a VM that needed to be adjusted(bigger file system) to run the 12.9.1 CUDA install script.
Anyhow, able to assign a G-H GPU to a VM under qemu-kvm, and in the
guest, successfully perform an 'nvidia-smi'. Previously, without this patch
series in the host, the nvida-smi command would fail and hang the guest.
(qemu-kvm was qemu-10.0 -based)
If anyone wants more details, or want more tests run, feel free to ask;
I can probably keep the system for another day or two, but I'll have to
give it up by this Friday.
Tested-by: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-21 4:21 [PATCH v9 0/6] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable ankita
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] KVM: arm64: Rename the device variable to s2_force_noncacheable ankita
2025-07-04 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] KVM: arm64: Update the check to detect device memory ankita
2025-07-04 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping ankita
2025-06-27 13:49 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-30 1:56 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-30 12:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 12:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 16:04 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-04 16:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-08 12:47 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-04 13:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] KVM: arm64: New function to determine hardware cache management support ankita
2025-07-04 13:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags ankita
2025-07-04 14:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 16:51 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: arm64: Expose new KVM cap for cacheable PFNMAP ankita
2025-07-04 13:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 15:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 16:20 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-07-04 16:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-27 5:03 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable Ankit Agrawal
2025-07-02 9:33 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-07-02 16:51 ` Donald Dutile [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a14ee0a-04af-407d-89a5-5222ee6da9c7@redhat.com \
--to=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dnigam@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=udhoke@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox