The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, aubrey.li@linux.intel.com,
	yu.c.chen@intel.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm delayed work
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:55:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a295a1e-08da-4684-81be-9539773a1c94@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17bda9071b6962414f61668698fa840501819172.camel@redhat.com>

On 2025-02-13 08:25, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 14:52 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> kernel test robot noticed
>> "WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#__queue_delayed_work" on:
>>
>> [    2.640924][    T0] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 2.641646][ T0] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/workqueue.c:2495
>> __queue_delayed_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2495 (discriminator 9))
>> [    2.642874][    T0] Modules linked in:
>> [    2.643381][    T0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
>> 6.14.0-rc2-00002-g287adf9e9c1f #1
>> [    2.644582][    T0] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX +
>> PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
>> [ 2.645943][ T0] RIP: 0010:__queue_delayed_work
>> (kernel/workqueue.c:2495 (discriminator 9))
> 
> There seem to be major problems with this configuration, I'm trying to
> understand what's wrong but, for the time being, this patchset is not
> ready for inclusion.

I think there is an issue with the order of init functions at boot.

poking_init() calls mm_alloc(), which ends up calling mm_init().

The WARN_ON() is about a NULL wq pointer, which I suspect happens
if poking_init() is called before workqueue_init_early(), which
allocates system_wq.

Indeed, in start_kernel(), poking_init() is called before
workqueue_init_early().

I'm not sure what are the init order dependencies across subsystems here.
There is the following order in start_kernel():

[...]
         mm_core_init();
         poking_init();
         ftrace_init();

         /* trace_printk can be enabled here */
         early_trace_init();

         /*
          * Set up the scheduler prior starting any interrupts (such as the
          * timer interrupt). Full topology setup happens at smp_init()
          * time - but meanwhile we still have a functioning scheduler.
          */
         sched_init();

         if (WARN(!irqs_disabled(),
                  "Interrupts were enabled *very* early, fixing it\n"))
                 local_irq_disable();
         radix_tree_init();
         maple_tree_init();

         /*
          * Set up housekeeping before setting up workqueues to allow the unbound
          * workqueue to take non-housekeeping into account.
          */
         housekeeping_init();

         /*
          * Allow workqueue creation and work item queueing/cancelling
          * early.  Work item execution depends on kthreads and starts after
          * workqueue_init().
          */
         workqueue_init_early();
[...]

So either we find a way to reorder this, or we make sure poking_init()
does not require the workqueue.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-10 15:32 [PATCH v6 0/3] sched: Restructure task_mm_cid_work for predictability Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-10 15:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] sched: Compact RSEQ concurrency IDs with reduced threads and affinity Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-13 14:56   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-18  7:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-20 15:08   ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-10 15:32 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm delayed work Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-13  6:52   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-13 13:25     ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-13 13:55       ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2025-02-13 14:37         ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-13 14:52       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-13 14:54         ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-13 17:31       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-14  6:44         ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-10 15:32 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-10 16:09 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] sched: Restructure task_mm_cid_work for predictability Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a295a1e-08da-4684-81be-9539773a1c94@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox