public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DaMouse <damouse@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Scheduler experiences
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:25:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a56ea390409050525583d0438@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1094386464.18114.0.camel@localhost>

On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 14:14:24 +0200, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk> wrote:
> Hey, i wonder which scheduler you people have the best experiences with,
> staircase or nicksched?
> 
> personally i were using nicksched for a long time, but then i tried
> staircase, and i like it overall more,
> 
> with nicksched its like, 1 process gets good prioity, so that if tvtime
> is running, it runs perfect, but moving windows and stuff will be not so
> fluid.
> with staircase, the overall performance is not as fast, but
> interactivity is really good, like tvtime runs fine, moving windows are
> fast as lightening, setiathome can also run perfect.
> 
> --
> Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

I personally like staircase, i also used to use nicksched but i prefer
staircases simple design and structure. Nicksched was pretty fast but
twiddling around all day with renicing X and now the HT issues are
annoying and staircase has always worked perfectly for me without
flipping fifty switches in the cockpit.

-DaMouse

-- 
I know I broke SOMETHING but its there fault for not fixing it before me

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-05 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-05 12:14 Scheduler experiences Kasper Sandberg
2004-09-05 12:25 ` DaMouse [this message]
2004-09-05 12:37   ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-05 12:43     ` DaMouse
2004-09-05 12:56       ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-05 12:49 ` Piotr Neuman
2004-09-05 14:25 ` Markus   Törnqvist
2004-09-05 15:55   ` Scheduler experiences (with Reiser4 bug report) Markus   Törnqvist
2004-09-05 16:07     ` Reiser4 bug Markus   Törnqvist
2004-09-08 17:53     ` Scheduler experiences (with Reiser4 bug report) Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a56ea390409050525583d0438@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=damouse@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox