public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FASTCALL fixing?
@ 2004-09-17 17:38 DaMouse
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: DaMouse @ 2004-09-17 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LKML

Hey,
       I get errors about the fastcall and type conflicts in 2.4.27
(yeah its old.. i know :) ) I was wondering what the politically
correct way of fixing these are? adding fastcall type to
kernel/sched.c or removing FASTCALL() around it in sched.h?

-DaMouse
-- 
I know I broke SOMETHING but its there fault for not fixing it before me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: FASTCALL fixing?
@ 2004-09-17 22:23 Mikael Pettersson
  2004-09-18 14:43 ` DaMouse
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2004-09-17 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: damouse, linux-kernel

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:38:46 +0100, DaMouse <damouse@gmail.com> wrote:
>       I get errors about the fastcall and type conflicts in 2.4.27
>(yeah its old.. i know :) ) I was wondering what the politically
>correct way of fixing these are? adding fastcall type to
>kernel/sched.c or removing FASTCALL() around it in sched.h?

gcc-3.4? Known issue. Fixed in 2.4.28-pre ages ago,
as the LKML archives should have told you.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: FASTCALL fixing?
  2004-09-17 22:23 Mikael Pettersson
@ 2004-09-18 14:43 ` DaMouse
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: DaMouse @ 2004-09-18 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LKML

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:23:42 +0200 (MEST), Mikael Pettersson
<mikpe@csd.uu.se> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:38:46 +0100, DaMouse <damouse@gmail.com> wrote:
> >       I get errors about the fastcall and type conflicts in 2.4.27
> >(yeah its old.. i know :) ) I was wondering what the politically
> >correct way of fixing these are? adding fastcall type to
> >kernel/sched.c or removing FASTCALL() around it in sched.h?
> 
> gcc-3.4? Known issue. Fixed in 2.4.28-pre ages ago,
> as the LKML archives should have told you.
> 

Yeah, sorry i didn't think to look in 2.4.28-pre, thanks :)

-DaMouse


-- 
I know I broke SOMETHING but its there fault for not fixing it before me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-18 14:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-17 17:38 FASTCALL fixing? DaMouse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-17 22:23 Mikael Pettersson
2004-09-18 14:43 ` DaMouse

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox