From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Valentin Vidić" <vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: mount fails with buffer overflow in strlen
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:12:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ab61ba3-8c9b-092c-7843-9c45b58e3987@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929062434.GN28341@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
On 9/29/21 2:24 PM, Valentin Vidić wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:38:59AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
>> Okay, you are right, strlen(src) is indeed wrong here.
>>
>> But please note that in strlcpy():
>> size_t ret = strlen(src);
>> if (size) {
>> size_t len = (ret >= size) ? size - 1 : ret;
>> memcpy(dest, src, len);
>> dest[len] = '\0';
>> }
>>
>> Take ci_stack "o2cb" for example, strlen("o2cb") may return wrong if the
>> coming byte is not null, say it is 10.
>> The input size is 5, so len will finally be 4.
>> So dest is still correct ending with null byte. No overflow happens.
>> So the problem here is the wrong return value, but it is discarded in
>> ocfs2_initialize_super().
>
> strlcpy starts with a call to strlen(src) and this is where the read overflow
> happens. If the kernel is compiled with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE this gets
> executed instead (include/linux/fortify-string.h):
>
> __FORTIFY_INLINE __kernel_size_t strlen(const char *p)
> {
> __kernel_size_t ret;
> size_t p_size = __builtin_object_size(p, 1);
>
> /* Work around gcc excess stack consumption issue */
> if (p_size == (size_t)-1 ||
> (__builtin_constant_p(p[p_size - 1]) && p[p_size - 1] == '\0'))
> return __underlying_strlen(p);
> ret = strnlen(p, p_size);
> if (p_size <= ret)
> fortify_panic(__func__);
> return ret;
> }
>
> So while strlcpy did work before this fortify check, it is probably not the
> best option anymore due to the missing null terminator in the source.
>
Got it, it really triggers panic in strlen().
So could you please update the commit log? I think CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE
is necessary information since it is not default enabled.
And add comments with your changes, e.g.
/*
* ci_stack and ci_cluster in ocfs2_cluster_info may not null
* terminated, make sure no overflow happens here.
*/
BTW, since we use kzalloc to alloc osb, so we don't have to manually
set the last null byte.
Thanks,
Joseph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-27 15:44 [PATCH] ocfs2: mount fails with buffer overflow in strlen Valentin Vidic
2021-09-28 12:05 ` Joseph Qi
2021-09-28 13:14 ` Valentin Vidić
2021-09-29 2:38 ` Joseph Qi
2021-09-29 6:24 ` Valentin Vidić
2021-09-29 9:12 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2021-09-29 18:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Valentin Vidic
2021-09-30 1:54 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ab61ba3-8c9b-092c-7843-9c45b58e3987@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox