Re: [patch V2 16/58] x86/apic: Sanitize num_processors handling

[Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1174 bytes --]

On 31.07.23 20:19, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 31.07.23 17:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 31 2023 at 14:50, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> Why can't XENPV pretend that it has a smp configuration detected,
>>> i.e. setting smp_found_config as any other special get_smp_config()
>>> implementation does?
>>
>> The below should do the trick, no?
> 
> Something like that, yes.
> 
> I'm just hunting another regression in the series. With patch 23 of the
> topology series applied the APs of a Xen PV guests won't be onlined. I
> guess this is due to missing topology data initialization somewhere in
> the Xen related code.
> 
> I'll check your suggestion after finding the reason for the regression.
> 
>>
>>
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
>> @@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ static void __init _get_smp_config(unsig
>>       if (subtract)
>>           set_nr_cpu_ids(nr_cpu_ids - subtract);
>>   #endif
>> -
>> +    /* Pretend to be a proper enumerated system */
>> +    smp_found_config = 1;
>>   }
>>   static void __init xen_pv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
> 

It is working fine.


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3149 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]