public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: "Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	ebpf@linuxfoundation.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: integrate test_tc_tunnel.sh tests into test_progs
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 12:56:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ac9d14e-4250-480c-b863-410be78ac6c6@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027-tc_tunnel-v3-3-505c12019f9d@bootlin.com>

On 10/27/25 7:51 AM, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
> +static int run_server(struct subtest_cfg *cfg)
> +{
> +	struct nstoken *nstoken = open_netns(SERVER_NS);

It is unlikely but still better to check for open_netns failure. Just in 
case that the network changes/traffic is accidentally done in the 
original netns. There are a few netns switching in the test. Please 
followup.

> +	int family = cfg->ipproto == 6 ? AF_INET6 : AF_INET;
> +
> +	cfg->server_fd = start_reuseport_server(family, SOCK_STREAM,
> +						cfg->server_addr, TEST_PORT,
> +						TIMEOUT_MS, 1);

Why reuseport is needed? Does it have issue in bind() to the same 
ip/port in the later sub-test?
> +	close_netns(nstoken);
> +	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(cfg->server_fd, NULL, "start server"))

I changed the check to ASSERT_OK_PTR. Also two other similar 
ASSERT_[N]EQ(..., NULL, ...) usages.
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void stop_server(struct subtest_cfg *cfg)
> +{
> +	close(*cfg->server_fd);

NULL check on cfg->server_fd is needed during the error path of 
run_test(). cfg->server_fd is leaked also. I changed it to 
free_fds(cfg->server_fd, 1) instead.

> +	cfg->server_fd = NULL;

I don't think cfg will be reused, so I skip this NULL assignment.

> +}
> +
> +static int check_server_rx_data(struct subtest_cfg *cfg,
> +				struct connection *conn, int len)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	memset(rx_buffer, 0, BUFFER_LEN);
> +	err = recv(conn->server_fd, rx_buffer, len, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, len, "check rx data len"))
> +		return 1;
> +	if (!ASSERT_MEMEQ(tx_buffer, rx_buffer, len, "check received data"))
> +		return 1;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct connection *connect_client_to_server(struct subtest_cfg *cfg)
> +{
> +	struct network_helper_opts opts = {.timeout_ms = 500};
> +	int family = cfg->ipproto == 6 ? AF_INET6 : AF_INET;
> +	struct connection *conn = NULL;
> +	int client_fd, server_fd;
> +
> +	conn = malloc(sizeof(struct connection));
> +	if (!conn)
> +		return conn;
> +
> +	client_fd = connect_to_addr_str(family, SOCK_STREAM, cfg->server_addr,
> +					TEST_PORT, &opts);
> +
> +	if (client_fd < 0) {
> +		free(conn);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	server_fd = accept(*cfg->server_fd, NULL, NULL);
> +	if (server_fd < 0) {

Fixed the client_fd leak.
Applied. Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-29 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-27 14:51 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] selftests/bpf: convert test_tc_tunnel.sh to test_progs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-27 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] selftests/bpf: add tc helpers Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-27 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] selftests/bpf: make test_tc_tunnel.bpf.c compatible with big endian platforms Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-27 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: integrate test_tc_tunnel.sh tests into test_progs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-29 19:56   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-10-30 14:04     ` Alexis Lothoré
2025-10-30 16:21       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-10-30 16:27         ` Alexis Lothoré
2025-10-27 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: remove test_tc_tunnel.sh Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-29 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] selftests/bpf: convert test_tc_tunnel.sh to test_progs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ac9d14e-4250-480c-b863-410be78ac6c6@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ebpf@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox