Re: [PATCH 4/4] selftests: kvm: add get_emulated_cpuid test

[Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>]

>> +static void check_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid, struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entrie)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cpuid->nent; i++) {
>> +		if (cpuid->entries[i].function == entrie->function &&
>> +		    cpuid->entries[i].index == entrie->index) {
>> +			if (is_cpuid_mangled(entrie))
>> +				return;
>> +
>> +			TEST_ASSERT(cpuid->entries[i].eax == entrie->eax &&
>> +				    cpuid->entries[i].ebx == entrie->ebx &&
>> +				    cpuid->entries[i].ecx == entrie->ecx &&
>> +				    cpuid->entries[i].edx == entrie->edx,
>> +				    "CPUID 0x%x.%x differ: 0x%x:0x%x:0x%x:0x%x vs 0x%x:0x%x:0x%x:0x%x",
>> +				    entrie->function, entrie->index,
>> +				    cpuid->entries[i].eax, cpuid->entries[i].ebx,
>> +				    cpuid->entries[i].ecx, cpuid->entries[i].edx,
>> +				    entrie->eax, entrie->ebx, entrie->ecx, entrie->edx);
>> +			return;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	TEST_ASSERT(false, "CPUID 0x%x.%x not found", entrie->function, entrie->index);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void compare_cpuids(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid1,
>> +						   struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid2)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cpuid1->nent; i++)
>> +		check_cpuid(cpuid2, &cpuid1->entries[i]);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cpuid2->nent; i++)
>> +		check_cpuid(cpuid1, &cpuid2->entries[i]);
>> +}
> 
> CPUID comparison here seems to be borrowed from get_cpuid_test.c, I
> think we can either put it to a library or (my preference) just merge
> these two selftests together. 'get_cpuid_test' name is generic enough to
> be used for KVM_GET_EMULATED_CPUID too.

Yes it is identical. I agree with you, I will merge the test in 
get_cpuid_test.c

Emanuele