From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261406AbVGLMYl (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:24:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261346AbVGLL5b (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 07:57:31 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.204]:52844 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261371AbVGLL4X (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 07:56:23 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=gN1X/jPE9r5PQsH82fGqUtGG/+AV/dTn1NzdpjXBcbJ9I/5M5pAFi2UiyJ309a70pb3yyJS/l23OnWoCDT1B3I3NOqWrExlNxslm+ag7Ik7B4MBd4RcRSQPenp+BAIzPxcuxm49OJ+TEsFuNPZUtQy8ZJdolLzCFhEU2jubWsDY= Message-ID: <1ba727770507120455789aaf0a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:25:20 +0530 From: Amrut Joshi Reply-To: Amrut Joshi To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SCSI luns Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1121168331.3171.21.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_10928_30197528.1121169320825" References: <1ba727770507120422562d525d@mail.gmail.com> <1121168331.3171.21.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ------=_Part_10928_30197528.1121169320825 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On 7/12/05, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:52 +0530, Amrut Joshi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently linux scsi subsystem doesnt store the 8-byte luns which are > > recieved in REPORT_LUNS reply. This information is forver lost once > > the scan is over. In my LDD I need this information. Currently I have > > to snoop REPORT_LUNS reply, do scsilun_to_int for all the luns and >=20 > which LDD is this? Is it ready for merging into the linux kernel yet? >=20 It will be ready for submission in a couple of months. The design (and implementation) would be simplified if these changes are accepted. Any thoughts? Sorry for the garbled patch. Attaching it again.=20 Please CC me on the replies. Thanks, -Amrut! ------=_Part_10928_30197528.1121169320825 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch" LS0tIGRyaXZlcnMvc2NzaS9zY3NpX3NjYW4uYy5vcmlnCTIwMDUtMDYtMzAgMDQ6MzA6NTMuMDAw MDAwMDAwICswNTMwCisrKyBkcml2ZXJzL3Njc2kvc2NzaV9zY2FuLmMJMjAwNS0wNy0xMiAxNjox OTo0OC41MzM3ODg1MjggKzA1MzAKQEAgLTExNzAsNiArMTE3MCw3IEBACiAJCQkJICAgICAgICIg YWJvcnRlZFxuIiwgZGV2bmFtZSwgbHVuKTsKIAkJCQlicmVhazsKIAkJCX0KKyAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIG1lbWNweShzZGV2LT5sdW5fYWRkcmVzcywgbHVucCwgc2l6ZW9mKHNkZXYt Pmx1bl9hZGRyZXNzKSk7CiAJCX0KIAl9CiAKLS0tIGluY2x1ZGUvc2NzaS9zY3NpX2RldmljZS5o Lm9yaWcJMjAwNS0wNi0zMCAwNDozMDo1My4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzA1MzAKKysrIGluY2x1ZGUvc2Nz aS9zY3NpX2RldmljZS5oCTIwMDUtMDctMTIgMTY6MTk6NDguNTM0Nzg4Mzc2ICswNTMwCkBAIC01 OCw2ICs1OCw4IEBACiAJCQkJCSAgIGNvdWxkIGFsbCBiZSBmcm9tIHRoZSBzYW1lIGV2ZW50LiAq LwogCiAJdW5zaWduZWQgaW50IGlkLCBsdW4sIGNoYW5uZWw7CisgICAgICAgIHN0cnVjdCBzY3Np X2x1biBsdW5fYWRkcmVzczsgICAgLyogc2NzaSBhZGRyZXNzIHJldHVybmVkIGJ5IFJFUE9SVF9M VU5TCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICogdXNhYmxlIG9u bHkgaWYgc2Rldi0+c2NzaV9sdW4gPj0gU0NTSV8zICovCiAKIAl1bnNpZ25lZCBpbnQgbWFudWZh Y3R1cmVyOwkvKiBNYW51ZmFjdHVyZXIgb2YgZGV2aWNlLCBmb3IgdXNpbmcgCiAJCQkJCSAqIHZl bmRvci1zcGVjaWZpYyBjbWQncyAqLwo= ------=_Part_10928_30197528.1121169320825--