From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca,
skhawaja@google.com, sdf@fomichev.me, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
amritha.nambiar@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pcnet32@frontier.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v6 5/9] net: napi: Add napi_config
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:48:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bdc12d6-ac23-49ff-a235-5ea54ca2ddaa@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z0d6QlrRUig5eD_I@LQ3V64L9R2>
On 11/27/24 12:00, Joe Damato wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 10:51:16AM -0800, Joe Damato wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 09:43:54AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 06:45:00PM +0000, Joe Damato wrote:
>>>> Add a persistent NAPI config area for NAPI configuration to the core.
>>>> Drivers opt-in to setting the persistent config for a NAPI by passing an
>>>> index when calling netif_napi_add_config.
>>>>
>>>> napi_config is allocated in alloc_netdev_mqs, freed in free_netdev
>>>> (after the NAPIs are deleted).
>>>>
>>>> Drivers which call netif_napi_add_config will have persistent per-NAPI
>>>> settings: NAPI IDs, gro_flush_timeout, and defer_hard_irq settings.
>>>>
>>>> Per-NAPI settings are saved in napi_disable and restored in napi_enable.
>>>>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> This patch triggers a lock inversion message on pcnet Ethernet adapters.
>>
>> Thanks for the report. I am not familiar with the pcnet driver, but
>> took some time now to read the report below and the driver code.
>>
>> I could definitely be reading the output incorrectly (if so please
>> let me know), but it seems like the issue can be triggered in this
>> case:
>
> Sorry, my apologies, I both:
> - read the report incorrectly, and
> - proposed a bad patch that would result in a deadlock :)
>
> After re-reading it and running this by Martin (who is CC'd), the
> inversion is actually:
>
> CPU 0:
> pcnet32_open
> lock(lp->lock)
> napi_enable
> napi_hash_add <- before this executes, CPU 1 proceeds
> lock(napi_hash_lock)
> CPU 1:
> pcnet32_close
> napi_disable
> napi_hash_del
> lock(napi_hash_lock)
> < INTERRUPT >
> pcnet32_interrupt
> lock(lp->lock)
>
> This is now an inversion because:
>
> CPU 0: holds lp->lock and is about to take napi_hash_lock
> CPU 1: holds napi_hashlock and an IRQ firing on CPU 1 tries to take
> lp->lock (which CPU 0 already holds)
>
> Neither side can proceed:
> - CPU 0 is stuck waiting for napi_hash_lock
> - CPU 1 is stuck waiting for lp->lock
>
> I think the below explanation is still correct as to why the
> identified commit causes the issue:
>
>> It seems this was triggered because before the identified commit,
>> napi_enable did not call napi_hash_add (and thus did not take the
>> napi_hash_lock).
>
> However, the previous patch I proposed for pcnet32 would also cause
> a deadlock as the watchdog timer's function also needs lp->lock.
>
> A corrected patch for pcnet32 can be found below.
>
> Guenter: Sorry, would you mind testing the below instead of the
> previous patch?
>
> Don: Let me know what you think about the below?
>
> Netdev maintainers, there is an alternate locking solution I can
> propose as an RFC that might avoid this class of problem if this
> sort of issue is more widespread than just pcnet32:
> - add the NAPI to the hash in netif_napi_add_weight (instead of napi_enable)
> - remove the NAPI from the hash in __netif_napi_del (instead of
> napi_disable)
>
> If changing the locking order in core is the desired route, than the
> patch below should be unnecessary, but:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c
> index 72db9f9e7bee..2e0077e68883 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c
> @@ -2625,11 +2625,10 @@ static int pcnet32_close(struct net_device *dev)
>
> del_timer_sync(&lp->watchdog_timer);
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->lock, flags);
> netif_stop_queue(dev);
> napi_disable(&lp->napi);
>
That is what I did, actually. Problem with that is that napi_disable()
wants to be able to sleep, thus the above triggers:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/dev.c:6775
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1817, name: ip
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
2 locks held by ip/1817:
#0: ffffffff81ded990 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x22a/0x74c
#1: ff6000000498ccb0 (&lp->lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: pcnet32_close+0x40/0x126
irq event stamp: 3720
hardirqs last enabled at (3719): [<ffffffff80decaf4>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x54/0x62
hardirqs last disabled at (3720): [<ffffffff80dec8a2>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5e/0x64
softirqs last enabled at (3712): [<ffffffff8001efca>] handle_softirqs+0x3e6/0x4a2
softirqs last disabled at (3631): [<ffffffff80ded6cc>] __do_softirq+0x12/0x1a
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1817 Comm: ip Tainted: G N 6.12.0-10313-g7d4050728c83-dirty #1
Tainted: [N]=TEST
Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80006d42>] dump_backtrace+0x1c/0x24
[<ffffffff80dc8d94>] show_stack+0x2c/0x38
[<ffffffff80de00b0>] dump_stack_lvl+0x74/0xac
[<ffffffff80de00fc>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
[<ffffffff8004da18>] __might_resched+0x23e/0x248
[<ffffffff8004da60>] __might_sleep+0x3e/0x62
[<ffffffff80b8d370>] napi_disable+0x24/0x10c
[<ffffffff809a06fe>] pcnet32_close+0x6c/0x126
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-27 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 18:44 [net-next v6 0/9] Add support for per-NAPI config via netlink Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:44 ` [net-next v6 1/9] net: napi: Make napi_defer_hard_irqs per-NAPI Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:44 ` [net-next v6 2/9] netdev-genl: Dump napi_defer_hard_irqs Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:44 ` [net-next v6 3/9] net: napi: Make gro_flush_timeout per-NAPI Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:44 ` [net-next v6 4/9] netdev-genl: Dump gro_flush_timeout Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-11 18:45 ` [net-next v6 5/9] net: napi: Add napi_config Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-11-27 17:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-27 18:51 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-27 20:00 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-27 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2024-11-30 20:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-02 17:34 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-27 21:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-28 1:17 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-28 1:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-10-11 18:45 ` [net-next v6 6/9] netdev-genl: Support setting per-NAPI config values Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-11-12 9:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-12 17:12 ` Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:45 ` [net-next v6 7/9] bnxt: Add support for persistent NAPI config Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:45 ` [net-next v6 8/9] mlx5: " Joe Damato
2024-10-11 18:45 ` [net-next v6 9/9] mlx4: Add support for persistent NAPI config to RX CQs Joe Damato
2024-10-15 1:10 ` [net-next v6 0/9] Add support for per-NAPI config via netlink patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bdc12d6-ac23-49ff-a235-5ea54ca2ddaa@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pcnet32@frontier.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox