public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
To: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	"Mark Bloch" <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	"Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fix double unregister of HCA_PORTS component
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 19:07:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bef8fd9-e9b8-4184-98be-98d016df20d0@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502727b0ad4a9bc34afb421d465646248c69f7d4.camel@linux.ibm.com>



On 12/4/2025 11:48 AM, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 17:14 +0200, Moshe Shemesh wrote:
>>
>> On 12/2/2025 1:12 PM, Gerd Bayer wrote:
>>>
> 
>    [ ... snip ... ]
> 
>>>
>>> Fixes: 5a977b5833b7 ("net/mlx5: Lag, move devcom registration to LAG layer")
>>> Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>> ---
>>> Hi Shay et al,
>>>
>>
>> Hi Gerd,
>>    I stepped on this bug recently too, without s390 and was about to
>> submit same fix :) So as you wrote it is unrelated to Lukas' patches and
>> this fix is correct.
> 
> Good to hear. I wonder if you could share how you got to run into this?
> 

mlx5_unload_one() can be called from few flows.
Even that it is always called with devlink lock, serial of 
mlx5_unload_one() twice caused it. I got it on fw_reset and shutdown. I 
I will submit also a patch for calling mlx5_drain_fw_reset() on shutdown 
soon.

>>
>>>
>>> I've spotted two additional places where the devcom reference is not
>>> cleared after calling mlx5_devcom_unregister_component() in
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/sd.c that I have not
>>> addressed with a patch, since I'm unclear about how to test these
>>> paths.
>>
>> As for the other cases, we had the patch 664f76be38a1 ("net/mlx5: Fix
>> IPsec cleanup over MPV device") and two other cases on shared clock and
>> SD but I don't see any flow the shared clock or SD can fail,
>> specifically mlx5_sd_cleanup() checks sd pointer at beginning of the
>> function and nullify it right after sd_unregister() that free devcom.
> 
> I didn't locate any calls to mxl5_devcom_unregister_component() in
> "shared clock" - is that not yet upstream?

mlx5_shared_clock_unregister() in 
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/clock.c

> 
> Regarding SD, I follow that sd_cleanup() is followed immediately after
> sd_unregister() and does the clean-up. One path remains uncovered
> though: The error exit at
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18/source/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/sd.c#L265
> 
> Not sure, how likely that is...

It comes on error flow but after successful 
mlx5_devcom_register_component() in sd_register(), and that error leads 
to error flow in mlx5_sd_init(), which calls sd_cleanup() too.

> 
> Thanks,
> Gerd


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-04 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-02 11:12 [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fix double unregister of HCA_PORTS component Gerd Bayer
2025-12-03 15:14 ` Moshe Shemesh
2025-12-04  9:48   ` Gerd Bayer
2025-12-04 17:07     ` Moshe Shemesh [this message]
2025-12-05  8:23       ` Gerd Bayer
2025-12-03 21:10 ` Farhan Ali
2025-12-04  8:27   ` Tariq Toukan
2025-12-04  9:00 ` Tariq Toukan
2025-12-04 14:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1bef8fd9-e9b8-4184-98be-98d016df20d0@nvidia.com \
    --to=moshe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox