From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
Zang Leigang <zangleigang@hisilicon.com>,
Avi Shchislowski <Avi.Shchislowski@wdc.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
stanley.chu@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:12:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d0e3c5441ecf14b6614ec0af0d30af6@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR04MB6575006E0682C3D11F54965DFC6A9@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 2021-03-17 19:23, Avri Altman wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote:
>> > The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when
>> > the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2).
>> >
>> > We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the
>> > next
>> > read.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 47
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h | 2 ++
>> > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> > index 0744feb4d484..0034fa03fdc6 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ int ufshpb_prep(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct
>> > ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
>> > if (rgn->reads == ACTIVATION_THRESHOLD)
>> > activate = true;
>> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rgn->rgn_lock, flags);
>> > - if (activate) {
>> > + if (activate ||
>> > + test_and_clear_bit(RGN_FLAG_UPDATE, &rgn->rgn_flags)) {
>> > spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
>> > ufshpb_update_active_info(hpb, rgn_idx, srgn_idx);
>> > hpb->stats.rb_active_cnt++;
>> > @@ -1480,6 +1481,20 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>> > struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
>> > case HPB_RSP_DEV_RESET:
>> > dev_warn(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
>> > "UFS device lost HPB information during PM.\n");
>> > +
>> > + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
>> > + struct scsi_device *sdev;
>> > +
>> > + __shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) {
>> > + struct ufshpb_lu *h = sdev->hostdata;
>> > +
>> > + if (!h)
>> > + continue;
>> > +
>> > + schedule_work(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
>> > + }
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > break;
>> > default:
>> > dev_notice(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
>> > @@ -1594,6 +1609,25 @@ static void
>> > ufshpb_run_inactive_region_list(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static void ufshpb_reset_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> Just curious, directly doing below things inside ufshpb_rsp_upiu()
>> does
>> not
>> seem a problem to me, does this really deserve a separate work?
> I don't know, I never even consider of doing this.
> The active region list may contain up to few thousands of regions -
> It is not rare to see configurations that covers the entire device.
>
Yes, true, it can be a huge list. But what does the ops
"HPB_RSP_DEV_RESET"
really mean? The specs says "Device reset HPB Regions information", but
I
don't know what is really happening. Could you please elaborate?
Thanks,
Can Guo.
> But yes, I can do that.
> Better to get ack from Daejun first.
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Can Guo.
>>
>> > +{
>> > + struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
>> > + struct victim_select_info *lru_info;
>> > + struct ufshpb_region *rgn;
>> > + unsigned long flags;
>> > +
>> > + hpb = container_of(work, struct ufshpb_lu, ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
>> > +
>> > + lru_info = &hpb->lru_info;
>> > +
>> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
>> > +
>> > + list_for_each_entry(rgn, &lru_info->lh_lru_rgn, list_lru_rgn)
>> > + set_bit(RGN_FLAG_UPDATE, &rgn->rgn_flags);
>> > +
>> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static void ufshpb_normalization_work_handler(struct work_struct
>> > *work)
>> > {
>> > struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
>> > @@ -1798,6 +1832,8 @@ static int ufshpb_alloc_region_tbl(struct
>> > ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>> > } else {
>> > rgn->rgn_state = HPB_RGN_INACTIVE;
>> > }
>> > +
>> > + rgn->rgn_flags = 0;
>> > }
>> >
>> > return 0;
>> > @@ -2012,9 +2048,12 @@ static int ufshpb_lu_hpb_init(struct ufs_hba
>> > *hba, struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hpb->list_hpb_lu);
>> >
>> > INIT_WORK(&hpb->map_work, ufshpb_map_work_handler);
>> > - if (hpb->is_hcm)
>> > + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
>> > INIT_WORK(&hpb->ufshpb_normalization_work,
>> > ufshpb_normalization_work_handler);
>> > + INIT_WORK(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work,
>> > + ufshpb_reset_work_handler);
>> > + }
>> >
>> > hpb->map_req_cache = kmem_cache_create("ufshpb_req_cache",
>> > sizeof(struct ufshpb_req), 0, 0, NULL);
>> > @@ -2114,8 +2153,10 @@ static void ufshpb_discard_rsp_lists(struct
>> > ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>> >
>> > static void ufshpb_cancel_jobs(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>> > {
>> > - if (hpb->is_hcm)
>> > + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
>> > + cancel_work_sync(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
>> > cancel_work_sync(&hpb->ufshpb_normalization_work);
>> > + }
>> > cancel_work_sync(&hpb->map_work);
>> > }
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> > index 84598a317897..37c1b0ea0c0a 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct ufshpb_region {
>> > struct list_head list_lru_rgn;
>> > unsigned long rgn_flags;
>> > #define RGN_FLAG_DIRTY 0
>> > +#define RGN_FLAG_UPDATE 1
>> >
>> > /* region reads - for host mode */
>> > spinlock_t rgn_lock;
>> > @@ -217,6 +218,7 @@ struct ufshpb_lu {
>> > /* for selecting victim */
>> > struct victim_select_info lru_info;
>> > struct work_struct ufshpb_normalization_work;
>> > + struct work_struct ufshpb_lun_reset_work;
>> >
>> > /* pinned region information */
>> > u32 lu_pinned_start;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 13:24 [PATCH v5 00/10] Add Host control mode to HPB Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] scsi: ufshpb: Cache HPB Control mode on init Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add host control mode support to rsp_upiu Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add region's reads counter Avri Altman
2021-03-11 7:52 ` Can Guo
2021-03-11 8:04 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-11 8:07 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 3:16 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 9:20 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 9:31 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 9:19 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 8:40 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 9:22 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] scsi: ufshpb: Make eviction depends on region's reads Avri Altman
2021-03-11 7:53 ` Can Guo
2021-03-11 8:06 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 8:30 ` Can Guo
2021-03-16 8:34 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] scsi: ufshpb: Region inactivation in host mode Avri Altman
2021-03-11 8:20 ` Can Guo
2021-03-11 9:03 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 4:02 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 7:33 ` Can Guo
2021-03-16 8:30 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 1:23 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 2:28 ` Daejun Park
2021-03-17 4:41 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 5:19 ` Daejun Park
2021-03-17 5:34 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 5:42 ` Daejun Park
2021-03-17 7:59 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response Avri Altman
2021-03-15 1:34 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 6:40 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 7:42 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 10:56 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 11:23 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 12:12 ` Can Guo [this message]
2021-03-17 12:22 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 13:50 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 14:22 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 14:36 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 15:46 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-18 1:00 ` Can Guo
2021-03-18 8:04 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add "Cold" regions timer Avri Altman
2021-03-15 1:37 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 7:54 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 9:36 ` Can Guo
2021-03-16 9:21 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 2:45 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 7:55 ` Avri Altman
2021-06-01 16:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] scsi: ufshpb: Limit the number of inflight map requests Avri Altman
2021-03-15 8:31 ` Can Guo
2021-03-16 8:32 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add support for host control mode Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] scsi: ufshpb: Make host mode parameters configurable Avri Altman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d0e3c5441ecf14b6614ec0af0d30af6@codeaurora.org \
--to=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Avi.Shchislowski@wdc.com \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=zangleigang@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox