From: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
erdemaktas@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com, jxgao@google.com,
sagis@google.com, oupton@google.com, peterx@redhat.com,
vkuznets@redhat.com, dmatlack@google.com, pgonda@google.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev, corbet@lwn.net,
hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 5/5] x86: CVMs: Ensure that memory conversions happen at 2M alignment
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:02:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d9d3372-825a-417a-8811-ffa501c83936@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGtprH_ANUVU+Dh1KOq0vpT7BGbCEvD2ab9B=sxjzHYsKxFGeA@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/02/2024 04:46, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:03 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/11/24 21:52, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
>>> @@ -2133,8 +2133,10 @@ static int __set_memory_enc_pgtable(unsigned long addr, int numpages, bool enc)
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> /* Should not be working on unaligned addresses */
>>> - if (WARN_ONCE(addr & ~PAGE_MASK, "misaligned address: %#lx\n", addr))
>>> - addr &= PAGE_MASK;
>>> + if (WARN_ONCE(addr & ~HPAGE_MASK, "misaligned address: %#lx\n", addr)
>>> + || WARN_ONCE((numpages << PAGE_SHIFT) & ~HPAGE_MASK,
>>> + "misaligned numpages: %#lx\n", numpages))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> This series is talking about swiotlb and DMA, then this applies a
>> restriction to what I *thought* was a much more generic function:
>> __set_memory_enc_pgtable(). What prevents this function from getting
>> used on 4k mappings?
>>
>>
>
> The end goal here is to limit the conversion granularity to hugepage
> sizes. SWIOTLB allocations are the major source of unaligned
> allocations(and so the conversions) that need to be fixed before
> achieving this goal.
>
> This change will ensure that conversion fails for unaligned ranges, as
> I don't foresee the need for 4K aligned conversions apart from DMA
> allocations.
Hi Vishal,
This assumption is wrong. set_memory_decrypted is called from various
parts of the kernel: kexec, sev-guest, kvmclock, hyperv code. These conversions
are for non-DMA allocations that need to be done at 4KB granularity
because the data structures in question are page sized.
Thanks,
Jeremi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-12 5:52 [RFC V1 0/5] x86: CVMs: Align memory conversions to 2M granularity Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 1/5] swiotlb: Support allocating DMA memory from SWIOTLB Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-14 14:49 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-15 3:33 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-15 9:44 ` Alexander Graf
2024-02-15 20:26 ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-24 17:07 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-24 22:02 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-05 17:19 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 2/5] swiotlb: Allow setting up default alignment of SWIOTLB region Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 3/5] x86: CVMs: Enable dynamic swiotlb by default for CVMs Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-01 12:20 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2024-02-02 4:40 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 4/5] x86: CVMs: Allow allocating all DMA memory from SWIOTLB Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:17 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 3:41 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-12 5:52 ` [RFC V1 5/5] x86: CVMs: Ensure that memory conversions happen at 2M alignment Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:33 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 3:46 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-01 12:02 ` Jeremi Piotrowski [this message]
2024-02-02 5:08 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-02 8:00 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2024-02-02 16:22 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-02-02 16:35 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-03 5:19 ` Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-30 16:42 ` [RFC V1 0/5] x86: CVMs: Align memory conversions to 2M granularity Vishal Annapurve
2024-01-31 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 5:44 ` Vishal Annapurve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d9d3372-825a-417a-8811-ffa501c83936@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=jxgao@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox