From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Support per-burst residue granularity
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:04:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1db9bac2-957d-3c0a-948a-429bc59f1b72@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7354d471-95e1-ffcd-db65-578e9aa425ac@gmail.com>
On 19/06/2019 00:27, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 19.06.2019 1:22, Ben Dooks пишет:
>> On 13/06/2019 22:08, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> Tegra's APB DMA engine updates words counter after each transferred burst
>>> of data, hence it can report transfer's residual with more fidelity which
>>> may be required in cases like audio playback. In particular this fixes
>>> audio stuttering during playback in a chromiuim web browser. The patch is
>>> based on the original work that was made by Ben Dooks [1]. It was tested
>>> on Tegra20 and Tegra30 devices.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190424162348.23692-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk/
>>>
>>> Inspired-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>> index 79e9593815f1..c5af8f703548 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>> @@ -797,12 +797,36 @@ static int tegra_dma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *dc)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +static unsigned int tegra_dma_update_residual(struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc,
>>> + struct tegra_dma_sg_req *sg_req,
>>> + struct tegra_dma_desc *dma_desc,
>>> + unsigned int residual)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long status, wcount = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (!list_is_first(&sg_req->node, &tdc->pending_sg_req))
>>> + return residual;
>>> +
>>> + if (tdc->tdma->chip_data->support_separate_wcount_reg)
>>> + wcount = tdc_read(tdc, TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_WORD_TRANSFER);
>>> +
>>> + status = tdc_read(tdc, TEGRA_APBDMA_CHAN_STATUS);
>>> +
>>> + if (!tdc->tdma->chip_data->support_separate_wcount_reg)
>>> + wcount = status;
>>> +
>>> + if (status & TEGRA_APBDMA_STATUS_ISE_EOC)
>>> + return residual - sg_req->req_len;
>>> +
>>> + return residual - get_current_xferred_count(tdc, sg_req, wcount);
>>> +}
>>
>> I am unfortunately nowhere near my notes, so can't completely
>> review this. I think the complexity of my patch series is due
>> to an issue with the count being updated before the EOC IRQ
>> is actually flagged (and most definetly before it gets to the
>> CPU IRQ handler).
>>
>> The test system I was using, which i've not really got any
>> access to at the moment would show these internal inconsistent
>> states every few hours, however it was moving 48kHz 8ch 16bit
>> TDM data.
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this, I am not sure if I am going to
>> get any time to look into this within the next couple of
>> months.
>
> I'll try to add some debug checks to try to catch the case where count is updated before EOC
> is set. Thank you very much for the clarification of the problem. So far I haven't spotted
> anything going wrong.
>
> Jon / Laxman, are you aware about the possibility to get such inconsistency of words count
> vs EOC? Assuming the cyclic transfer mode.
I can't say that I am. However, for the case of cyclic transfer, given
that the next transfer is always programmed into the registers before
the last one completes, I could see that by the time the interrupt is
serviced that the DMA has moved on to the next transfer (which I assume
would reset the count).
Interestingly, our downstream kernel implemented a change to avoid the
count appearing to move backwards. I am curious if this also works,
which would be a lot simpler that what Ben has implemented and may
mitigate that race condition that Ben is describing.
Cheers
Jon
[0]
https://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/gitweb/?p=linux-4.4.git;a=commit;h=c7bba40c6846fbf3eaad35c4472dcc7d8bbc02e5
--
nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-19 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 21:08 [PATCH v1] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Support per-burst residue granularity Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-14 15:21 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-14 15:24 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-14 16:44 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-17 10:57 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-17 12:41 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-18 8:47 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-18 9:45 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-18 22:22 ` Ben Dooks
2019-06-18 23:27 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-19 10:04 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2019-06-19 10:08 ` Ben Dooks
2019-06-19 10:13 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-19 10:16 ` Ben Dooks
2019-06-19 10:27 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-19 10:55 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-19 11:10 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-19 12:22 ` Jon Hunter
2019-06-19 13:52 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-19 21:56 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-06-19 12:55 ` Ben Dooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1db9bac2-957d-3c0a-948a-429bc59f1b72@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox