From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D92570831 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745884165; cv=none; b=SCIA36tmpecR5biy4n98W2vDTMR+b2TBVz/tEQffgEndi5xPiU39sOzWeqDz9vzCPEuyIbUSPZrVnCNWMwguAvcf+D4eDp+teczmWNehpYSIjBSvH0hpe+4YGs5pI0r0zhZBad6oTvpnUTj5yUyTe94cCdGGERDxvYCUdWz+Ci0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745884165; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RPecJtYrTRe3sMGzhINU2fSMF3oytGDr3+63rCcMlYU=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=BrmRB3P293wlLgjPgj6qujXGlRDzRZn8enlpCOAhvXCXh0J3ajXwXSBMc1Q5qBnAOsLQZV/pFT6HqkvnYJEzvIYWJfTwAXKQs0+Vsn6pvAnOIPclhLyuUcLA829dISCW2SgZQhoVLUJO/xtB4tR/CqjeKhl/ywHdBXr1lOZYQQM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZAsemGmP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZAsemGmP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D45BDC4CEE4; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:49:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745884164; bh=RPecJtYrTRe3sMGzhINU2fSMF3oytGDr3+63rCcMlYU=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=ZAsemGmPkNa4upqFCm9RXc0nbaLwySd/YF+c9pdyTX6MBbIvvKZOWM+cIe7Ing6Cn 4bmHkIdnRK5ossvGL/g49JttGtATiuBGfh6bMZ1Ch+vUmdv/l7CPXx05Zrgg4zNUw7 0wImbPKFICmbAyX/TqcSPR/MdhlZyX9RE4QpJI5Kx2NVnK8+00AeXqth7DFlFA/VAv pM9TYdXY2BYsHOFdCESyTEhPJhnQQTyk31WUTrkE9FdB2CVBaTnMhfcdXhB+I0IH9A jZIQZSiD15BgGDoMPs+GtcIj/UwtRKdWWqesbCm2gWjl2IFnNywfyXkOxEv1PEv8F3 WQmai7Iq+oB0g== Message-ID: <1de0fc4c00120ee6541693d13f7b8f9c@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20250319092951.37667-37-jirislaby@kernel.org> References: <20250319092951.37667-1-jirislaby@kernel.org> <20250319092951.37667-37-jirislaby@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 36/57] irqdomain: spmi: Switch to irq_domain_create_tree() From: Stephen Boyd Cc: maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) To: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) , tglx@linutronix.de Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:49:22 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.12.dev8+g17a99a841c4b Quoting Jiri Slaby (SUSE) (2025-03-19 02:29:29) > irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to > the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first > parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct > device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the > parameter. >=20 > Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of > indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not > guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to > case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW). >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) > Cc: Stephen Boyd > --- Applied to spmi-next