From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Sean Hunter <sean@dev.sportingbet.com>,
bobyetman@att.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Loadavg calculation
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:39:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001106233957.A392@bug.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011050746090.634-100000@juryrig.worldnet.att.net> <20001106081426.I6131@bart.dev.sportingbet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20001106081426.I6131@bart.dev.sportingbet.com>; from Sean Hunter on Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 08:14:26AM +0000
Hi!
> > I'm working a project a work that is using Linux to run some very
> > math-intensive calculations. One of the things we do is use the 1-minute
> > loadavg to determine how busy the machine is and can we fire off another
> > program to do more calculations. However, there's a problem with that.
> >
> > Because it's a 1 minute load average, there's quite a bit of lag time from
> > when 1 program finishes until the loadavg goes down below a threshold for
> > our control mechanism to fire off another program.
> >
> > Let me give an example (all on a 1-cpu PC)
> >
> > HH:MM:SS
> > 00:00:00 fire off 4 programs
> > 00:01:00 loadavg goes up to 4
> > 00:01:30 3 of the 4 programs finish loadavg still at 4
> > 00:02:20 load avg goes down to 1, below our threshold
> > 00:02:21 we fire off 3 more programs.
> >
> > We'd like to reduce that almost 50 second lag time. Is it possible, in
> > user-space, to duplicate the loadavg calculation period, say to a 15
> > second load average, using the information in /proc?
pavel@bug:~$ cat /proc/loadavg
0.00 0.00 0.00 2/46 395
pavel@bug:~$
The three values of 0.00 are loadavg averaged over different
time. Select the right one and you are done.
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-10 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-05 12:55 Loadavg calculation bobyetman
2000-11-05 13:58 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-05 14:01 ` bert hubert
2000-11-05 20:24 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2000-11-06 8:14 ` Sean Hunter
2000-11-06 22:39 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-07 14:20 Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001106233957.A392@bug.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=bobyetman@att.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean@dev.sportingbet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox