Re: Installing kernel 2.4

["Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>]

On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 03:25:56AM +0000, davej@suse.de wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> 
> > If the compiler always aligned all functions and data on 16 byte
> > boundries (NetWare)  for all i386 code, it would run a lot faster.
> 
> Except on architectures where 16 byte alignment isn't optimal.
> 
> > Cache line alignment could be an option in the loader .... after all,
> > it's hte loader that locates data in memory.  If Linux were PE based,
> > relocation logic would be a snap with this model (like NT).
> 
> Are you suggesting multiple files of differing alignments packed into
> a single kernel image, and have the loader select the correct one at
> runtime ? I really hope I've misinterpreted your intention.

Or more practically, a smart loader than could select a kernel image
based on arch and auto-detect to load the correct image. I don't really
think it matters much what mechanism is used.   

What makes more sense is to pack multiple segments for different 
processor architecures into a single executable package, and have the 
loader pick the right one (the NT model).  It could be used for 
SMP and non-SMP images, though, as well as i386, i586, i686, etc.  

Jeff

> 
> regards,
> 
> Davej.
> 
> -- 
> | Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>  http://www.suse.de/~davej
> | SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/