From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: axp-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI-PCI bridges mess in 2.4.x
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:37:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001108093744.D27324@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001101153420.A2823@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20001101093319.A18144@twiddle.net> <20001103111647.A8079@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20001103011640.A20494@twiddle.net> <20001106192930.A837@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20001108013931.A26972@twiddle.net> <20001108142513.A5244@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20001108142513.A5244@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:25:13PM +0300, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> I relied on DEC^WIntel 21153 datasheet which says that to turn off
> io/mem window this bridge must be programmed with base > limit
> values (and the code actually did that).
Interesting. I hadn't known that. It didn't actually fail with
the ALI bridge, I just assumed it was a mistake. Can anyone with
docs on non-DEC bridges confirm that this is a common thing?
Certainly the fact should be commented if the old code goes back
in to avoid disruption by helpful folks like myself. :-)
r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-08 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20001101153420.A2823@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
[not found] ` <20001101093319.A18144@twiddle.net>
[not found] ` <20001103111647.A8079@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
[not found] ` <20001103011640.A20494@twiddle.net>
[not found] ` <20001106192930.A837@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
2000-11-08 9:39 ` PCI-PCI bridges mess in 2.4.x Richard Henderson
2000-11-08 10:19 ` Sean Hunter
2000-11-08 11:25 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2000-11-08 17:37 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2000-11-08 22:03 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2000-11-08 22:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08 23:49 ` Richard Henderson
2000-11-09 14:41 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2000-11-08 23:48 ` Richard Henderson
2000-11-09 14:39 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2000-11-09 20:37 ` Gérard Roudier
2000-11-09 23:17 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2000-11-10 18:35 ` Gérard Roudier
2000-11-10 21:29 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2000-11-10 21:26 ` Gérard Roudier
2000-11-08 15:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-08 17:20 ` Richard Henderson
[not found] ` <20001108113859.A10997@animx.eu.org>
[not found] ` <3A098594.A85DFE0D@mandrakesoft.com>
[not found] ` <20001108122306.A11107@animx.eu.org>
[not found] ` <3A0989CC.2537FCEA@mandrakesoft.com>
2000-11-09 16:33 ` Wakko Warner
2000-11-09 23:31 ` Michal Jaegermann
2000-11-10 10:52 ` Sean Hunter
2000-11-08 18:22 Dunlap, Randy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-09 16:36 Wakko Warner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001108093744.D27324@twiddle.net \
--to=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=axp-list@redhat.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox