From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 01:57:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 01:56:49 -0500 Received: from vp175121.reshsg.uci.edu ([128.195.175.121]:46602 "EHLO moisil.dev.hydraweb.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 01:56:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:56:03 -0800 Message-Id: <200011090656.eA96u3Y22945@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com> From: Ion Badulescu To: Scott McDermott Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: Stange NFS messages - 2.2.18pre19 In-Reply-To: <20001109024949$4fc3@tornado.cs.columbia.edu> User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.17 (i586)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:15:38 -0500, Scott McDermott wrote: > Sasi Peter on Tue 7/11 23:28 +0100: >> I'm getting this under moderate NFS load: >> Nov 6 17:39:56 iq kernel: svc: server socket destroy delayed (sk_inuse: 1) >> Nov 6 17:40:08 iq kernel: svc: unknown program 100227 (me 100003) >> Nov 6 19:06:11 iq kernel: svc: server socket destroy delayed (sk_inuse: 1) >> Nov 6 19:38:48 iq kernel: svc: server socket destroy delayed (sk_inuse: 1) >> >> What do these means? Is this a kernel bug? > > Your Suns are using TCP mounts, this got introduced into 2.2.18 > somewhere and is a bit broken, do a patch -R with > ftp://oss.sgi.com/www.projects/nfs3/download/nfs_tcp-2.2.17.dif and > these go away. Suns try TCP mounts first. Be careful to unmount them > first or they will hang waiting for the TCP server to come back up. I really really think this should be backed out -- or at the very least disabled. The code wasn't part of the dhiggen merge, it wasn't tested, and it doesn't work well. Heck, it's still experimental and not recommended in 2.4.0-test. What's worse, it will burn everybody out there who is using am-utils or an automounter that tries TCP mounts first. NFS/UDP server support in 2.2.18 is so much better than in previous versions, it would a shame to ruin it with this ill-fated patch. Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/