* Linux-2.2.x-BUG(?) memmory not detected
@ 2000-11-13 0:43 Anton Altaparmakov
2000-11-13 1:24 ` J . A . Magallon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anton Altaparmakov @ 2000-11-13 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan.Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
Just noticed that both 2.2.18pre21 and RedHat-7.0-patched-2.2.16 kernels
only detect 64Mb out of 192Mb RAM on my Dual Celeron/Intel 440GX chipset
based workstation. - I haven't tried any other 2.2 kernels on that
particular PC so maybe this is a general 2.2.x thing.
The setup is one 64Mb SDRAM and one 128Mb SDRAM so it would seem that the
128Mb one is not detected at all.
All 2.3/2.4 kernels I have tried have always detected the full 192Mb RAM.
Is this a known feature or a bug? - If I can supply any more info to help
track this down just let me know what you want to know and I will be happy
to obtain the information from this PC...
Regards,
Anton
--
"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he
learned in school." - Albert Einstein
--
Anton Altaparmakov
Christ's College eMail: AntonA@bigfoot.com / aia21@cam.ac.uk
Cambridge CB2 3BU ICQ: 8561279
United Kingdom WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux-2.2.x-BUG(?) memmory not detected
2000-11-13 0:43 Linux-2.2.x-BUG(?) memmory not detected Anton Altaparmakov
@ 2000-11-13 1:24 ` J . A . Magallon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: J . A . Magallon @ 2000-11-13 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anton Altaparmakov; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:43:44 Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just noticed that both 2.2.18pre21 and RedHat-7.0-patched-2.2.16 kernels
> only detect 64Mb out of 192Mb RAM on my Dual Celeron/Intel 440GX chipset
> based workstation. - I haven't tried any other 2.2 kernels on that
> particular PC so maybe this is a general 2.2.x thing.
>
> The setup is one 64Mb SDRAM and one 128Mb SDRAM so it would seem that the
> 128Mb one is not detected at all.
>
> All 2.3/2.4 kernels I have tried have always detected the full 192Mb RAM.
>
It's a bug, but in the mobo. Some motherboards lie about its installed ram.
2.3+ kernels have a workaround for detection, but in 2.2 you still have
to manually add <append="mem=128M"> in your lilo.conf file.
--
Juan Antonio Magallon Lacarta #> cd /pub
mailto:jamagallon@able.es #> more beer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-11-13 1:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-11-13 0:43 Linux-2.2.x-BUG(?) memmory not detected Anton Altaparmakov
2000-11-13 1:24 ` J . A . Magallon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox