From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@innominate.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Advanced Linux Kernel/Enterprise Linux Kernel
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:34:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001120133423.A221@toy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200011141459.IAA413471@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> <3A117311.8DC02909@holly-springs.nc.us> <news2mail-3A15ACE3.5BED2CA3@innominate.de> <20001118164021.A156@toy> <news2mail-3A183A01.4F214A4F@innominate.de>
In-Reply-To: <news2mail-3A183A01.4F214A4F@innominate.de>; from news-innominate.list.linux.kernel@innominate.de on Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 09:37:21PM +0100
Hi!
> > > Actually, I was planning on doing on putting in a hack to do something
> > > like that: calculate a checksum after every buffer data update and check
> > > it after write completion, to make sure nothing scribbled in the buffer
> > > in the interim. This would also pick up some bad memory problems.
> >
> > You might want to take look to a patch with crc loop option.
> >
> > It does verify during read, not during write; but that's even better because
> > that way you pick up problems in IO subsystem, too.
>
> You would have to store the checksums on the filesystem then, or use a
I store checksums in separate partition.
> verify-after-write. What I was talking about is a
> verify-the-buffer-didn't get scribbled. I'd then trust the hardware to
> report a write failure. Note that if something scribbles on your buffer
> between the time you put good data on it and when it gets transfered to
> disk, you can verify perfectly and still have a hosed filesystem.
Actually, I have 50% chance detecting that corruption. If it happens
between application and loop, I detect nothing. If it happens between
loop and disk, I catch it.
Pavel
--
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-20 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-14 14:59 Advanced Linux Kernel/Enterprise Linux Kernel Jesse Pollard
2000-11-14 15:47 ` David Weinehall
2000-11-14 17:14 ` Michael Rothwell
2000-11-14 16:20 ` Mike Dresser
2000-11-14 17:27 ` Michael Rothwell
2000-11-14 17:32 ` Michael Rothwell
2000-11-14 16:25 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-11-14 17:29 ` Michael Rothwell
2000-11-14 16:38 ` Mark Hahn
2000-11-14 19:23 ` spam
2000-11-14 16:41 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-11-14 17:06 ` Michael Meissner
2000-11-14 17:59 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-11-14 17:51 ` Buddha Buck
2000-11-14 18:10 ` Michael Rothwell
2000-11-14 18:00 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-11-15 0:31 ` Gerhard Mack
2000-11-14 20:08 ` Alexander Viro
2000-11-14 16:57 ` David Relson
2000-11-14 18:17 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-14 19:15 ` spam
2000-11-14 16:53 ` David Relson
2000-11-14 17:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-14 17:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2000-11-14 18:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2000-11-14 23:06 ` Werner Almesberger
2000-11-15 4:25 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2000-11-17 22:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2000-11-18 0:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2000-11-18 20:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2000-11-18 16:40 ` Pavel Machek
2000-11-19 20:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2000-11-20 13:34 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2000-11-14 17:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-17 5:28 Bernd Eckenfels
2000-11-15 4:19 Marty Fouts
2000-11-14 18:20 Marty Fouts
2000-11-14 18:18 Marty Fouts
2000-11-14 18:10 Marty Fouts
2000-11-14 19:43 ` Steve VanDevender
2000-11-15 1:13 ` Leo Mauro
2000-11-14 18:06 Marty Fouts
2000-11-14 18:03 Marty Fouts
2000-11-08 20:31 [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore
2000-11-13 21:56 ` Advanced Linux Kernel/Enterprise Linux Kernel Josue Emmanuel Amaro
2000-11-14 7:49 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2000-11-14 18:33 ` lamont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001120133423.A221@toy \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@innominate.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox