Re: silly [< >] and other excess

[Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>]

Ragnar Hojland Espinosa writes:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:26:30AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > Oh, missed this one.  Here you're wrong again.  The numbers in [< >]
> > should be looked up, and no others.  The code can look exactly like
> > a kernel address.  In this case you definitely do NOT want to have
> > them converted.
> 
> Okay.  How about just using some prefix to the hex number, such as '>'?
> It'll still save plenty of space, and would be trivial changes for the
> tools.  

That is more a question for Keith Owens, not me.  Keith is the maintainer
of ksymoops.  He has to be happy with the address highlighting.  I just
have to be happy that we don't loose ksymoops.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  |   |         Russell King        rmk@arm.linux.org.uk      --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html   /  /  |
  | +-+-+                                                     --- -+-
  /   |               THE developer of ARM Linux              |+| /|\
 /  | | |                                                     ---  |
    +-+-+ -------------------------------------------------  /\\\  |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/