Re: silly [< >] and other excess

Russell King
2000-11-23T18:51:56Z

Ragnar Hojland Espinosa writes:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:26:30AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > Oh, missed this one. Here you're wrong again. The numbers in [< >]
> > should be looked up, and no others. The code can look exactly like
> > a kernel address. In this case you definitely do NOT want to have
> > them converted.
>
> Okay. How about just using some prefix to the hex number, such as '>'?
> It'll still save plenty of space, and would be trivial changes for the
> tools.

That is more a question for Keith Owens, not me. Keith is the maintainer
of ksymoops. He has to be happy with the address highlighting. I just
have to be happy that we don't loose ksymoops.
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |