From: Andries Brouwer <aeb@veritas.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 21:01:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001125210147.A6798@veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14878.58.908955.701821@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011251522430.8818-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011251522430.8818-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:26:15PM -0200
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:26:15PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The gcc-2.95.2-6cl from Conectiva 6.0 is buggy too.
Yes. Probably you have seen it by now, but the difference between
good and bad versions of gcc-2.95.2 did not lie in the applied patches,
but was the difference between compilation for 686 or 386.
It is not your (SuSE's, Debian's) fault. A fix already exists.
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-25 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-24 5:20 gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Andries.Brouwer
2000-11-24 5:44 ` Neil Brown
2000-11-24 6:47 ` Alexander Viro
2000-11-25 17:26 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-25 19:16 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-25 20:01 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2000-11-25 20:06 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-26 15:33 ` Olaf Dietsche
2000-11-26 16:58 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-26 19:36 ` Mike Castle
2000-11-26 19:41 ` Russell King
2000-11-26 19:55 ` J . A . Magallon
2000-11-24 9:37 ` Ion Badulescu
2000-11-24 10:18 ` Linux Kernel Developer
2000-11-24 9:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-24 8:09 Frédéric L . W . Meunier
2000-11-24 12:48 Andries.Brouwer
2000-11-24 16:46 ` Matthew Vanecek
2000-11-24 13:04 Mikael Pettersson
2000-11-27 14:28 Pavel Pisa;research student
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001125210147.A6798@veritas.com \
--to=aeb@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox