From: John Kennedy <jk@csuchico.edu>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blindingly stupid 2.2 VM bug
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:35:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001128163532.F7323@north.csuchico.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001119100100.A54301@niksula.cs.hut.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011201135590.4587-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <20001124152831.A5696@valinux.com> <20001125145701.A12719@athlon.random> <20001128150235.A7323@north.csuchico.edu> <20001129002009.I14675@athlon.random> <20001128153615.E7323@north.csuchico.edu> <20001129010416.J14675@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20001129010416.J14675@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:04:16AM +0100
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:04:16AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:36:15PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
> > No, it is all ext3fs stuff that is touching the same areas your
>
> Ok this now makes sense. I ported VM-global-7 on top of ext3 right now
> but it's untested:
Not for long. (:
> ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.18pre18/VM-global-2.2.18pre18-7-against-ext3-0.0.3b-1.bz2
Is ext3-0.0.3b the most current/stable? On the FTP site (well,
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs at least) it looks like
ext3-0.0.2f is current (which is what I've been using), but under the
test directory I see ext3-0.0.3b as well as ext3-0.0.5b. I haven't
heard anything new about ext3fs in a long, long time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-29 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-19 0:04 [PATCH] blindingly stupid 2.2 VM bug Rik van Riel
2000-11-19 8:01 ` Ville Herva
2000-11-20 13:38 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-24 23:28 ` Chip Salzenberg
2000-11-25 13:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-25 17:06 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-28 23:02 ` John Kennedy
2000-11-28 23:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-28 23:36 ` John Kennedy
2000-11-29 0:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-29 0:35 ` John Kennedy [this message]
2000-11-30 11:47 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001128163532.F7323@north.csuchico.edu \
--to=jk@csuchico.edu \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox