public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>
To: Christopher Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fasttrak100 questions...
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:10:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001130131015.C12886@vger.timpanogas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8voa7g$d1r$1@forge.tanstaafl.de> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011291152500.5109-100000@sol.compendium-tech.com> <20001129210830.J17523@forge.tanstaafl.de> <20001129165236.A9536@vger.timpanogas.org> <3A266EE7.4C734350@nortelnetworks.com> <20001130114349.A12564@vger.timpanogas.org> <3A2697E1.B41C448@nortelnetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A2697E1.B41C448@nortelnetworks.com>; from cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:09:37PM -0500

On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:09:37PM -0500, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:14:47AM -0500, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> 
> > > I think you should re-read the GPL.  You only have to provide source to
> > > people to whome you have distributed your new binaries, and you only
> > > have to provide that source if you are asked for it.  If you have some
> > > code that you have written that is based on GPL'd code, and you are the
> > > only person that ever runs the binaries, then there is no obligation for
> > > you to make your code available to anybody.
> > 
> > Depends on what terms the code is provided under.  Using GPL code in a
> > for profit enterprise and distributing it to customers does require
> > that the changes be provided upon request.  I have read the GPL, and
> > I've had a lot of lawyers around here read and analyze it too.
> > 
> > :-)
> 
> Well of course this is the case.  I specifically said that I am the only
> one that ever ran the binaries.  Once you start distributing it to other
> people, then they can request the source additions/modifications and you
> are obligated to provide it.
> 
> Theoretically you could use software based on GPL'd code all throughout
> a for-profit corporation and make boatloads of money using that
> software.  As long as you don't distribute it to customers outside the
> company, and as long as none of the employees using it ask for the
> source and distribute it outside the company, nobody outside that
> corporation has any right to the source even though it is being used for
> profit.

I'm not certain this is technically correct, but I think it would be worth
having some folks here investigate this secnario.

Jeff


> 
> -- 
> Chris Friesen                    | MailStop: 043/33/F10  
> Nortel Networks                  | work: (613) 765-0557
> 3500 Carling Avenue              | fax:  (613) 765-2986
> Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada        | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-11-30 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-24 22:46 Fasttrak100 questions James Lamanna
2000-11-25  1:35 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-25 12:10   ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2000-11-25 17:20     ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-25 17:22     ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-29 19:53     ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2000-11-29 20:08       ` Henning P . Schmiedehausen
2000-11-29 21:11         ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-29 22:12           ` Stop your abusive language! (Re: Fasttrak100 questions...) Dominik Kubla
2000-11-29 23:52         ` Fasttrak100 questions Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-30 15:14           ` Christopher Friesen
2000-11-30 18:43             ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-11-30 18:09               ` Christopher Friesen
2000-11-30 20:10                 ` Jeff V. Merkey [this message]
2000-12-02  3:44             ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-03 22:54               ` Pavel Machek
2000-12-05  4:10                 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-11-29 20:42       ` Alan Cox
2000-11-29 21:05         ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-29 21:10           ` James A Sutherland
2000-11-29 21:18             ` Alan Cox
2000-11-29 21:30             ` Andre Hedrick
2000-12-02 16:50         ` Pavel Machek
2000-12-02 17:18           ` Alan Cox
2000-12-02 23:46             ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2000-12-03  1:21               ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-03  1:31                 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-03  3:42                 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2000-12-03  5:11                   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-05  7:07                     ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2000-12-05  8:25                       ` Jeff V. Merkey
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-03 16:41 Wayne.Brown
2000-12-03 17:49 ` Pavel Machek
2000-12-03 18:45 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20001130131015.C12886@vger.timpanogas.org \
    --to=jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox