public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud Installe <ainstalle@filepool.com>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: high load & poor interactivity on fast thread creation
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:47:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001201104745.C1413@bartok.filepool.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001130081443.A8118@bach.iverlek.kotnet.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011301459250.17363-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011301459250.17363-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>; from david.lang@digitalinsight.com on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:00:10PM -0800

On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:00:10PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
> try the 2.4 test kernels. I had a situation of poor performance with lots
> of processes and saw a dramatic improvement with the 2.4 kernel.

So what load average should I expect Linux versions 2.2 and 2.4 to perform
well under ?  I'm wondering what would be the best way to solve this
problem: limit the number of processes created during a certain time span;
check if the load average isn't too high before creating a new thread (and
go to sleep if it isn't); or something else ?

Thanks very much BTW !  The list has always been very helpful.  :-)

								Arnaud

> > When creating a lot of Java threads per second linux slows down to a
> > crawl.  I don't think this happens on NT, probably because NT doesn't
> > create new threads as fast as Linux does.
> > 
> > Is there a way (setting ?) to solve this problem ?  Rate-limit the number
> > of threads created ?  The problem occurred on linux 2.2, IBM Java 1.1.8.

-- 
Arnaud Installe						<ainstalle@filepool.com>

Man has never reconciled himself to the ten commandments.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-12-01 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-30  7:14 high load & poor interactivity on fast thread creation Arnaud Installe
2000-11-30 14:47 ` Ray Bryant
2000-11-30 16:11   ` Arnaud Installe
2000-11-30 16:37     ` James A Sutherland
2000-12-27 11:01   ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2000-12-27 17:11     ` Michael Rothwell
2000-12-27 17:25       ` Gregory Maxwell
2000-12-27 17:32         ` Larry McVoy
2000-12-27 19:43           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-30 16:12 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-30 23:00 ` David Lang
2000-12-01  9:47   ` Arnaud Installe [this message]
2000-12-01 21:20     ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20001201104745.C1413@bartok.filepool.com \
    --to=ainstalle@filepool.com \
    --cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox