From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:11:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001209181130.A15531@vger.timpanogas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A3066EC.3B657570@timpanogas.org> <E144O4d-0003vd-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20001208113340.B4730@vger.timpanogas.org> <m17l59tfpx.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
In-Reply-To: <m17l59tfpx.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>; from ebiederm@xmission.com on Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 03:03:22PM -0700
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 03:03:22PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org> writes:
> Hmm. If this is the case then shouldn't someone point this out. To the
> antitrust lawyers. You present this as a clear case of deliberately
> preventing interoperability between NT and linux.
>
> The generous side of me suggests that they might be trying to fix some
> mistakes, or enhance things. Linux isn't standing still on the fs
> format issue either.
>
> Eric
I think the anitrust issues are moot -- they have had their way already
with Microsoft. They've been left beaten and crippled in the eyes of
the general public. Large Customers seem to not be swallowing .NET.
Their behavior is inconsistent with the Trial Judge's ruling. Technically,
by pursuing .NET, they are not observing the spirit of the ruling. If
you get a ruling put on you by a court, you are supposed to observe what
it says and correct your behavior, even if the execution order was stayed
by the court pending appeal. The Judge did not set aside the ruling --
it's still there.
Because of this, any investment in Microsoft strategies by large enterprise
customers are an unknown until the appeals court makes a determination.
Microsoft is also setting itself up for a contempt order by doing this.
The trial court told them to stay out of the internet business with their
operating systems business unit. Their compliance has been illusionary
with the court's ruling, and unless the appeals court vacates the ruling,
they could be in big trouble.
If I were the DOJ, I would already be putting together an OFC for
filing with the trial court. They are also doing the worst possible
thing you can do while a case is on appeal, which is to ignore the
trial court's rulings, and resorting to character assisination of
the trial judge.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-10 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-08 3:27 [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-08 4:13 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-08 4:43 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-08 5:53 ` Michael H. Warfield
2000-12-08 4:54 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-08 5:04 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-08 5:08 ` [PATCH] NTFS repair tools Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-08 6:06 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-08 8:17 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-08 14:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-12-08 7:37 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2000-12-08 19:01 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-08 7:50 ` [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2000-12-08 13:19 ` David Relson
2000-12-08 13:43 ` David Weinehall
2000-12-08 14:34 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2000-12-08 17:02 ` Michael H. Warfield
2000-12-08 18:35 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-08 14:00 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-08 14:27 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-08 14:44 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2000-12-08 15:08 ` David Woodhouse
2000-12-08 14:50 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-08 18:33 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-08 17:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-12-08 18:50 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-09 22:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2000-12-10 1:11 ` Jeff V. Merkey [this message]
2000-12-10 2:12 ` Ren Haddock
2000-12-10 5:26 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-12-10 2:34 ` David Feuer
2000-12-10 2:49 ` Daryll Strauss
2000-12-12 2:23 ` Jes Sorensen
2000-12-12 2:46 ` Wakko Warner
2000-12-10 5:00 ` John Alvord
2000-12-10 16:11 ` Horst von Brand
2000-12-08 13:55 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-08 18:31 ` Jeff V. Merkey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-09 8:00 Mark Sutton
2000-12-09 16:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2000-12-09 20:14 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-09 22:51 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-12-11 13:52 ` Xavier Bestel
2000-12-10 1:38 willy tarreau
2000-12-10 2:40 ` Jeff V. Merkey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001209181130.A15531@vger.timpanogas.org \
--to=jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox