From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.19pre3
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:56:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001222205601.A13546@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E149GRm-0003sX-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20001222213358.A5829@elektroni.ee.tut.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20001222213358.A5829@elektroni.ee.tut.fi>; from kaukasoi@elektroni.ee.tut.fi on Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 09:33:58PM +0200
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 09:33:58PM +0200, Petri Kaukasoina wrote:
> I think in case of BIOS-88 it now sees 1 Meg less than should. int 15, ah=88
Yes, you're right, sorry. Here a backout against 2.2.19pre3:
--- 2.2.19pre3-e820/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c.~1~ Fri Dec 22 14:51:26 2000
+++ 2.2.19pre3-e820/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Fri Dec 22 20:54:27 2000
@@ -376,8 +376,7 @@
e820.nr_map = 0;
add_memory_region(0, i386_endbase, E820_RAM);
- add_memory_region(HIGH_MEMORY, (mem_size << 10)-HIGH_MEMORY,
- E820_RAM);
+ add_memory_region(HIGH_MEMORY, (mem_size << 10), E820_RAM);
}
printk("BIOS-provided physical RAM map:\n");
print_memory_map(who);
The other part of the 2.4.x patch is still valid.
Thanks,
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-22 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-22 0:52 Linux 2.2.19pre3 Alan Cox
2000-12-22 3:40 ` Mitch Adair
2000-12-22 15:32 ` Petri Kaukasoina
2000-12-22 15:53 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-22 16:02 ` Chad Schwartz
2000-12-22 16:23 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-22 16:25 ` Chad Schwartz
2000-12-22 16:43 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-22 17:54 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2000-12-22 18:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2000-12-22 16:21 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-22 19:33 ` Petri Kaukasoina
2000-12-22 19:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2000-12-23 12:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2000-12-28 1:18 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-28 2:37 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-28 10:23 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-28 12:20 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-28 13:53 ` Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system time (was: Linux 2.2.19pre3) Matthias Andree
2000-12-28 14:14 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-29 12:42 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-30 12:39 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-30 17:01 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-30 17:38 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-30 17:50 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-30 17:39 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-31 10:34 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-31 11:28 ` Chris Wedgwood
2000-12-31 13:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-02 13:52 ` [PATCH] CMOS locking for 2.4 (was: /proc/apm slows system time) Paul Gortmaker
2000-12-31 13:37 ` Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system time (was: Linux 2.2.19pre3) Alan Cox
2000-12-31 15:50 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-31 16:13 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-02 16:32 ` Matthias Andree
2001-01-02 17:31 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-03 22:02 ` Matthias Andree
2000-12-28 11:14 ` Linux 2.2.19pre3 Guest section DW
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001222205601.A13546@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox