From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 18:57:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 18:57:43 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:31808 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 18:57:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 00:27:00 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: torvalds@transmeta.com, mauelshagen@sistina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvm-devel@sistina.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] LVM proc fix Message-ID: <20001226002700.D25861@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20001225235950.A23247@caldera.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20001225235950.A23247@caldera.de>; from hch@ns.caldera.de on Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 11:59:51PM +0100 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 11:59:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Linus & Heinz, > > there has been some discussion about the LVM /proc #ifdefs in > Linux 2.4.0-test13pre4 (LVM 0.9). How about just removing > CONFIG_LVM_PROC_FS? - beople that use LVM and procfs usually do > not care for the few extra bytes. I think it's a good idea. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/