From: Jakob Østergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Paul Jakma <paulj@itg.ie>
Cc: Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RAID - IDE - here we go again...
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:37:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001227183748.A9491@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200012261952.TAA11390@mauve.demon.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012271620530.24075-100000@rossi.itg.ie>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012271620530.24075-100000@rossi.itg.ie>; from paulj@itg.ie on Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:23:43PM +0000
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:23:43PM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Ian Stirling wrote:
>
> > The PCI bus can move around 130MB/sec,
>
> in bursts yes, but sustained data bandwidth of PCI is a lot lower,
> maybe 30 to 50MB/s. And you won't get sustained RAID performance >
> sustained PCI performance.
Much higher than 30-50 - but yes, the total bandwidth won't exceed
the slowest channel.
>
> > Anyway, in clarification, Rik mentioned that two reads from different
> > disk (arrays?) on the same controller at the same time get more or less
> > the same speed.
>
> try scsi.
SCSI won't get you a faster PCI bus. Guys, *PLEASE*, - everyone on this list
knows what the respective virtues and horrors of SCSI and IDE are. Configured
properly, both can perform well, configured wrongly, both will suck.
The timings below are from a dual PII-350, Asus P2B-DS, it has a six disk SCSI
RAID and a five disk IDE RAID. The IDE raid is configured properly with one
channel per disk - which would have solved the performance problem in the array
that spawned this thread.
(By the way: the SCSI RAID is configured with three controllers for the six
disks, because of the low SCSI bus bandwidth, reality rules in the SCSI world
as well)
Kernel is 2.2, RAID is 0.90, IDE is Andre's
---------------------------------------
Dual PII-350, 256 MB RAM, test on 1 GB file
Filesystem: 75 GB ext2fs
RAID: Linux Softare RAID-5
Disks: 5 pcs. IBM Deskstar 75 GXP (30GB)
Controller: 3 pcs. Promise PDC-2067
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
1024 4998 98.0 28660 45.9 14586 50.4 5386 98.5 71468 79.1 338.6 5.2
28 MB/sec write, 71MB/sec read on RAID-5.
---------------------------------------
Same box, test on 1 GB file
Filesystem: 18 GB ext2fs
RAID: Linux Softare RAID-0
This array is built on other partitions on the same disks as above.
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
1024 5381 99.7 44267 50.1 22613 62.1 5469 99.4 98075 91.4 311.0 5.0
44 MB/sec write, 98 MB/sec read on RAID-0. That's thru *one* PCI bus folks.
Please, for further comments or another IDE-hotplug-can!-cannot!-can-so!, let's
take this to linux-raid or #offtopic ;)
Enough said.
--
................................................................
: jakob@unthought.net : And I see the elder races, :
:.........................: putrid forms of man :
: Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, :
: OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20001226172448.A7660@convergence.de>
2000-12-26 16:35 ` Abysmal RAID 0 performance on 2.4.0-test10 for IDE? Rik van Riel
2000-12-26 19:52 ` Ian Stirling
2000-12-26 20:24 ` Barry K. Nathan
2000-12-27 16:23 ` Paul Jakma
2000-12-27 17:37 ` Jakob Østergaard [this message]
2000-12-28 21:42 ` Tim Wright
2000-12-28 21:57 ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001227183748.A9491@unthought.net \
--to=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulj@itg.ie \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=root@mauve.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox