From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Peter Osterlund <peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parport@torque.net,
tim@cyberelk.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:41:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010104014115.C6256@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2k88czda4.fsf@ppro.localdomain> <20010103201344.A3203@athlon.random> <m2hf3gz6yc.fsf@ppro.localdomain> <20010103223504.L32185@athlon.random> <m266jww55q.fsf@ppro.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <m266jww55q.fsf@ppro.localdomain>; from peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:08:01AM +0100
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:08:01AM +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> What do you think about the following patch? It also works for all the
> tests mentioned in my previous message.
I'm worried somebody needed to disable LP_CAREFUL to print, probably it's not a
big deal to keep it. About the lp_wait_ready that's what I had in mind with the
"rework" thing and it looks fine. However parport_write can still could silenty
discard data, but maybe it can't notice errors with some handshake. I didn't
checked the details of the DMA based handshake so Tim needs to comment if
this can be considered a final/right fix (I hope it's not ;).
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-04 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-03 18:44 Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease Peter Osterlund
2001-01-03 19:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-03 21:00 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-03 21:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 0:08 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 0:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-01-04 1:09 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 1:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 11:17 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 9:27 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 13:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 11:20 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 13:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 14:20 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 14:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 14:54 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 19:45 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 19:07 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 21:52 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-05 0:33 ` Peter Osterlund
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-04 15:30 Jesse Pollard
2001-01-04 19:22 ` Gunther Mayer
2001-01-05 1:13 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-01-04 23:20 ` David Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010104014115.C6256@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parport@torque.net \
--cc=peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se \
--cc=tim@cyberelk.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox