From: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Osterlund <peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 14:20:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010104142043.N23469@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2k88czda4.fsf@ppro.localdomain> <20010104112027.G23469@redhat.com> <20010104145229.E17640@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20010104145229.E17640@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:52:29PM +0100
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:52:29PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I think lp_check_status.
Okay. So what about this patch instead? If the printer is off-line
to start with, fall into parport_write anyway (it will just time out
and return 0). If LP_ABORT is set, we return -EAGAIN.
Tim.
*/
--- lp.c~ Thu Jan 4 11:04:30 2001
+++ lp.c Thu Jan 4 14:16:42 2001
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
last = LP_PSELECD;
printk(KERN_INFO "lp%d off-line\n", minor);
}
- error = -EIO;
+ error = -EAGAIN;
} else if (!(status & LP_PERRORP)) {
if (last != LP_PERRORP) {
last = LP_PERRORP;
@@ -270,8 +270,11 @@
parport_set_timeout (lp_table[minor].dev,
lp_table[minor].timeout);
- if ((retv = lp_check_status (minor)) == 0)
- do {
+ retv = lp_check_status (minor);
+ if (retv == -EAGAIN && (LP_F(minor) & LP_ABORT) == 0)
+ retv = 0;
+
+ if (retv == 0) do {
/* Write the data. */
written = parport_write (port, kbuf, copy_size);
if (written >= 0) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-04 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-03 18:44 Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease Peter Osterlund
2001-01-03 19:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-03 21:00 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-03 21:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 0:08 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 0:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 1:09 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 1:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 11:17 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 9:27 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 13:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 11:20 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 13:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 14:20 ` Tim Waugh [this message]
2001-01-04 14:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-04 14:54 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-04 19:45 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 19:07 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-01-04 21:52 ` Tim Waugh
2001-01-05 0:33 ` Peter Osterlund
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-04 15:30 Jesse Pollard
2001-01-04 19:22 ` Gunther Mayer
2001-01-05 1:13 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-01-04 23:20 ` David Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010104142043.N23469@redhat.com \
--to=twaugh@redhat.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox