public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Traby <stefan@hello-penguin.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@innominate.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 22:49:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010104224946.C1290@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101031253130.6567-100000@springhead.px.uk.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101031325270.1403-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <3A5352ED.A263672D@innominate.de> <20010104192104.C2034@redhat.com> <20010104220821.B775@stefan.sime.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010104220821.B775@stefan.sime.com>; from stefan@hello-penguin.com on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:08:21PM +0100

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:08:21PM +0100, Stefan Traby wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:21:04PM +0000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> 
> > ext3 does the recovery automatically during mount(8), so user space
> > will never see an unrecovered filesystem.  (There are filesystem flags
> > set by the journal code to make sure that an unrecovered filesystem
> > never gets mounted by a kernel which doesn't know how to do the
> > appropriate recovery.)
> 
> I did not follow the ext3 development recently, how did you solve
> the "read-only mount(2) (optionally on write protected media)" issue ?
> 
> Does the mount fail, or does the code virtually replays (without writing)
> only ?

The code currently checks if the underlying media is write-protected.
If it is, it fails the mount; if not, it does the replay (so that
mounting a root fs readonly works correctly).

I will be adding support for virtual replay for root filesystems to
act as a last-chance way of recovering if you really cannot write to
the root, but journaling filesystems really do expect to be able to
write to the media so I am not sure whether it makes sense to support
this on non-root filesystems too.

> I think any other action (only replaying on rw mount and presenting
> a broken filesystem on ro) is quite fatal, at least if I think of
> a replay on -remount,rw :)

Correct.

> Also, an unconditional hidden replay even if "ro" is specified is not nice.

> This is especially critical on root filesystem

In what way?  A root fs readonly mount is usually designed to prevent
the filesystem from being stomped on during the initial boot so that
fsck can run without the filesystem being volatile.  That's the only
reason for the readonly mount: to allow recovery before we enable
writes.  With ext3, that recovery is done in the kernel, so doing that
recovery during mount makes perfect sense even if the user is mounting
root readonly.

Cheers,
 Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-04 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-03 12:55 Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown? Dr. David Gilbert
2001-01-03 15:26 ` Rik van Riel
2001-01-03 15:38   ` Michael Rothwell
2001-01-03 16:18   ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-03 16:27   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-01-03 16:42     ` Alex Belits
2001-01-04  8:00       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-01-04 17:39         ` Alex Belits
2001-01-03 18:52     ` Dr. David Gilbert
2001-01-04  9:57       ` Helge Hafting
2001-01-04 10:14         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-01-04 10:25           ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-04 17:43           ` David Lang
2001-01-04 17:52             ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-04 18:00               ` David Lang
2001-01-04 18:11                 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-05  4:12                   ` Chipzz
2001-01-05  4:18                     ` Alan Cox
2001-01-05 16:55                   ` Mike Touloumtzis
2001-01-05 16:57                   ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-05 22:09                 ` Pavel Machek
2001-01-04 17:59             ` Alan Cox
2001-01-04 18:10               ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-04 18:15                 ` Mo McKinlay
2001-01-04 18:19                   ` David Lang
2001-01-04 18:20                     ` Mo McKinlay
2001-01-04 19:42                       ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-01-04 20:31                         ` egger
2001-01-04 20:59                           ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-01-04 21:05                             ` egger
2001-01-04 22:45                             ` Erik Mouw
2001-01-04 18:23                   ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-05 12:04                   ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-04 18:21               ` Dr. David Gilbert
2001-01-04 18:11             ` Mo McKinlay
2001-01-04 21:00         ` Brett G. Person
2001-01-05 22:05         ` Pavel Machek
2001-01-04 19:21     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-01-04 21:08       ` Stefan Traby
2001-01-04 22:49         ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2001-01-05  1:01           ` Stefan Traby
2001-01-05  8:10             ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-05 11:05             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-01-05 11:58         ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-06 19:57           ` Marc Lehmann
2001-01-06 20:09             ` Stefan Traby
2001-01-06 20:35               ` Chris Mason
2001-01-06 21:49                 ` Marc Lehmann
2001-01-08 12:02             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-01-09  9:34               ` Roger Gammans
2001-01-05  0:31       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-01-05  8:00         ` Andreas Dilger
2001-01-05 12:46           ` Alan Cox
2001-01-05 12:59             ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-05 13:22             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-01-05 10:31         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
     [not found] <fa.e3022cv.v2ucim@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.naq8vev.74ai08@ifi.uio.no>
2001-01-04 22:38   ` Dan Maas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-08 23:19 Bernd Eckenfels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010104224946.C1290@redhat.com \
    --to=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillips@innominate.de \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=stefan@hello-penguin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox