From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 18:29:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 18:29:31 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:8458 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 18:29:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 23:25:41 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Alexander Viro Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Andreas Dilger , Andreas Dilger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Ext2 development mailing list Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] ext2_new_block() behaviour Message-ID: <20010104232541.J1290@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010104220433.T1290@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:31:12PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:31:12PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > > BTW, what inumber do you want for whiteouts? IIRC, we decided to use > the same entry type as UFS does (14), but I don't remember what was > the decision on inumber. UFS uses 1 for them, is it OK with you? 0 is used for padding, so 1 makes sense, yes. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/