From: Tim Sailer <sailer@bnl.gov>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network Performance?
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:00:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010105140021.A2016@bnl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010104013340.A20552@bnl.gov>
In-Reply-To: <20010104013340.A20552@bnl.gov>; from sailer@bnl.gov on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:33:40AM -0500
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:33:40AM -0500, Tim Sailer wrote:
> This may not be the right forum to ask this. If not, please let me know
> where to ask.
>
> I have a Debian box with 2 NICs. Both 100/full duplex. This machine is
> running as a ftp proxy (T.Rex suite). As part of the traffic going through the
> box, some streams have 1000k window size for a certain reason. How do
> I tune the NICs to handle the streams better? There are ways of doing this
> on other OSs. Right now, the box only does about 1.8Mb when it should be doing
> 80+Mb.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> PS: This is really something to do with the window size and WAN latency.
> The ultimate source and destination points are either Solaris or AIX
> boxes. The files being sent are > 1GB in size.
> The box does well when traffic goes in one NIC and out the other, as long
> as the end point is local When it hits the WAN, it all dies. Traffic not
> going through the box just flies right along, as long as both the end points
> have the large tcp window size. Putting the Linux box in the middle is a
> severe choke point. :(
I have followed the suggestions in http://www.psc.edu/networking/perf_tune.html
but I still can not get any kind of real throughput. 250kB is all I can
get from the Linux box. Setting [r|w]mem_[default|max] larger than 16k
makes no difference, smaller slows things down even more. Has anyone else
ran across this and fixed it? I can't be the only one with a Linux box
on a fat pipe looking for maximum throughput...
Tim
--
Tim Sailer <sailer@bnl.gov> Cyber Security Operations
Brookhaven National Laboratory (631) 344-3001
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-05 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-04 6:33 Network Performance? Tim Sailer
2001-01-05 19:00 ` Tim Sailer [this message]
2001-01-06 11:11 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-06 15:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-08 4:51 ` Tim Sailer
2001-01-08 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-08 14:06 ` Tim Sailer
2001-01-08 18:07 ` Erik Mouw
2001-01-09 13:55 ` Tim Sailer
2001-01-09 16:52 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-01-09 18:35 ` Tim Sailer
2001-01-08 18:40 ` Craig I. Hagan
2001-01-09 15:29 ` Tim Sailer
2001-01-08 19:58 ` John Heffner
2001-01-09 16:53 ` Tim Sailer
2001-01-09 19:29 ` John Heffner
2001-01-09 20:56 ` Tim Sailer
2001-01-11 10:00 ` Pekka Pietikainen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010105140021.A2016@bnl.gov \
--to=sailer@bnl.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox