From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:41:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:41:07 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:1540 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:40:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20010105234604.C301@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:46:04 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: adefacc@tin.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits In-Reply-To: <3A546385.C50B1092@tin.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <3A546385.C50B1092@tin.it>; from A.D.F. on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:50:29AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Hi, I would like to know whether following limits are right for kernel > 2.4.x: > > Max. N. of CPU: 32 (SMP) > Max. CPU speed: > 2 Ghz (up to ?) > Max. RAM size: 64 GB (any slowness accessing RAM over 4 GB > with 32 bit machines ?) 64GB on i386. I believe you can get few terabytes with ultrasparc. > Max. file size: 1 TB (?) > Max. file system size: 2 TB (?) Again, maybe on i386 with ext2. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/