From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:47:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:46:57 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:10438 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:46:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 16:43:45 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Linux-Kernel mailing list , ReiserFS List Cc: Stephen Tweedie Subject: Re: ext3fs 0.0.5d and reiserfs 3.5.2x mutually exclusive Message-ID: <20010108164345.A2431@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010104135044.A5097@emma1.emma.line.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010104135044.A5097@emma1.emma.line.org>; from matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:50:44PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:50:44PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > I just tried to patch ext3fs 0.0.5d on top of a 2.2.18 that already had > reiserfs 3.5.28 and failed, there are overlapping patches in fs/buffer.c > that I cannot resolve for lack of knowledge how buffer.c and journalling > are supposed to fit together. > > I reported ext3fs and reiserfs incompatibilities quite some time ago. I know, and the answer is still the same: removing the extra debugging stuff and buffer.c code from the ext3 patches is on the todo list but is much lower priority than finishing off the tuning and user-space code for ext3-1.0. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/